DEV Community

loading...

Discussion on: Avoiding the messy git history

Collapse
vlaja profile image
Vlatko Vlahek Author

Hi Jean-Michel,

Thank you for your comment. The purpose of the article was not to preach a specific case but to outline a common one from my own experiences.

I don't believe there is a single optimal flow to use for all types of projects, in the same manner, that I don't believe there is a single "best" technology out there. It all drills down to solving a specific problem. Also, I would always pick consistency inside a team, before a "better" flow, as the most important thing is that everybody is efficient and understand what they are doing.

We use different flows inhouse, based on the project, and whether it is a small website, mobile app or a SaaS product. One of the flows that we also use for some cases in contrast to GitFlow is Stable Mainline Branching model: bitsnbites.eu/a-stable-mainline-br...

The only real consistency is that we always use a rebase flow, that doesn't change.

The context is:

  • Projects are usually 2-5 developers working together. Most are 1dev/1feature as we prefer smaller features that we quickly iterate on, but there are cases when 2-3 people work on a feature if this is not applicable.

  • I had the unfortunate luck of working on tons of client projects, where there were no, or very lousy git practices. Resolving any type of conflict was a problem, and even "missing code" was sometimes the case. This is one of the reasons why we have a strict pattern in our company. When people get used to it, it becomes second nature. Usually, new developers are actively mentored during the first 2 months on git practices and our code standards to alleviate the overhead of using something that may seem like a complex flow at first.

  • As stated in the article, nothing is lost if your graph is a bit messy, but this allows the team lead to more easily see the order of merged features, revert or bisect commits or features if a problem was introduced, and quickly pinpoint the issue, leading to faster hotfixes from our experience.

  • The GitFlow pattern also works great with our CircleCI build setup, where PR-s to specific features are automatically tested and released to test/staging/production servers.

Collapse
jmfayard profile image
Jean-Michel Fayard πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡΄

Thanks a lot, adding context like this makes it insightful : we saw those problems, and here is what we did to mitigate them.