I find that the SQLCommand class is simpler to use than the LINQ to SQL API. Plus they both end up at the DataReader class nonetheless. Sounds like an interesting method to use SQL: will post about when finished researching.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I dont think you should ever use this with Linq around, which gets translated to secure SQL queries on the fly
I find that the
SQLCommandclass is simpler to use than the LINQ to SQL API. Plus they both end up at theDataReaderclass nonetheless. Sounds like an interesting method to use SQL: will post about when finished researching.