The Dopamine Hit of git push vs. The Agony of git revert

We are not just engineers. We are artists, craftspeople, and architects of digital worlds. And like any creative, our work is a fragile extension of ourselves. This is why two of the most mundane commands in our arsenal— git push and git revert—carry more emotional weight than a thousand lines of code. They are the zenith and the nadir of our daily existence. Let's talk about the high.

The Ritual of the Push: A Symphony of Validation

It rarely starts with git push itself. The ritual begins earlier. You've been in the zone for hours. The outside world has melted away. There's just you, the compiler, and the problem. You've wrestled with a bug that felt like a personal vendetta, and you've won.

You type the final sequence:

git add .
git commit -m "feat: finally squash that ridiculous off-by-one error in the grid renderer"

The commit message is a mix of technical summary and personal triumph. You’re not just logging a change; you're writing a victory cry in the battle log.
Then, the moment of truth. You take a breath.

git push origin feature/my-brilliant-refactor

You hit Enter.

This is the dopamine hit.

It’s a chemical reward that is almost physical. It’s the feeling of release, of contribution, of completion. You have taken a piece of your intellect, your creativity, your problem-solving skill, and you have injected it into the collective consciousness of the project. It's now part of the canon. It exists for others to see, to use, to build upon.

In this moment, you are:

• A Hero: you've slain the dragon of a critical bug
• An Artist: You've painted a new feature onto the canvas of the application.
• A Scholar: You've added a new theorem to the codebase's library.

The CI/CD pipeline kicks off. You watch the builds turn green. The tests pass. It’s a public, automated standing ovation. You lean back in your chair, a small, satisfied smile on your face. You have made a difference. This is why we do what we do.

But for every peak, there is a valley. And in our world, the valley is deep, dark, and smells of cold brew and regret.

The Descent into git revert: A Silent Funeral

The downfall never comes with a bang. It comes as a Slack message. A DM. Sometimes just a @here in the team channel.

"Hey, is the site down for anyone else?" 
"The payment form seems to be... broken?" 
"I'm getting a 500 error just by looking at the homepage."

A cold knot forms in your stomach. You refresh the production monitoring dashboard. You see the error rate spike. The timeline aligns perfectly with your last, glorious, dopamine-fueled git push.

The investigation is a frantic, silent panic. Your heart hammers against your ribs. You trace the issue, and there it is. Not in some obscure, legacy code you touched. Not in a third-party library.

It’s in your code. The "brilliant" refactor. The "elegant" solution.

You introduced a race condition. You missed a null check in a seemingly impossible scenario. You broke the unbreakable. The commit SHA that, just an hour ago, felt like a medal of honor, now glows on your screen like an accusation.

Your team is calm, professional. "No worries, let's just roll it back." But the words are a gut punch.

The command is simple. Deceptively so.

git revert <that_awful_commit_sha>

You type it. You hit Enter.

This is the agony.

The git revert is not just a technical undo. It's a public, recorded, and permanent admission of failure. It is the digital equivalent of a museum taking down your painting because you used the wrong kind of paint that's damaging the other artworks.

The emotional whiplash is brutal. The dopamine has been violently flushed from your system, replaced by a cocktail of shame, embarrassment, and self-doubt.

In this moment, you are:

• The Saboteur: You broke the build. You disrupted everyone's workflow.
• The Imposter: The thought whispers, "Do I even know what I'm doing?"
• The Liability: Your "contribution" was so toxic the project had to vomit it out.

You watch the revert commit get pushed. You see the build run again. You see the error rates drop. The site comes back. The team breathes a sigh of relief.

But you are left in the silence, staring at the Revert "feat: finally squash that ridiculous..." commit in the log. A tombstone for your ambition.

The Unseen Battle: Our Psychology in Version Control

This cycle isn't just about workflow; it's about our fundamental human psychology.

git push taps into:

• Agency: The feeling of control and impact.
• Competence: The proof that we are skilled and capable.
• Relatedness: The act of contributing to a shared goal.

`git revert triggers:**

• Cognitive Dissonance: "I thought I was good, but my code broke production."
• Fear of Judgement: "What does my team really think of me now?"
• The Perfectionism Trap: The belief that any mistake is a catastrophic failure of character.

We tie our self-worth to our code. When the code is celebrated, we are celebrated. When the code is reverted, a part of us feels reverted.

Finding the Antidote: How to Survive the Rollercoaster

So how do we navigate this? How do we enjoy the highs without being destroyed by the lows?

1. Decouple Your Identity from Your Code. You are not your code. Your code is a thing you make, like a chair. Sometimes a chair has a wobbly leg. You don't hate yourself; you fix the chair. You are a crafts-person, not the craft.

2. Reframe git revert as a Safety Net, Not a Scaffold. The fact that you can git revert so easily is a feature, not a bug. It's a testament to a mature, resilient engineering process. It means your team has the tooling and culture to recover quickly from mistakes. This is a sign of strength, not weakness.

3. Celebrate the Revert. This sounds crazy, but hear me out. A team that can safely and quickly revert a bad commit is a healthy team. The real failure isn't the bug that got to production; it's the organizational dysfunction that would have made it impossible to roll back. The revert is the system working as designed.

4. Embrace the "Oops." Normalize talking about mistakes. In your stand-ups, when you say what you did yesterday, also mention a mistake you made and what you learned. "Yesterday I pushed a change that broke the login flow. I reverted it and learned that our error handling in the auth service is more brittle than I thought." This transforms you from a "person who messed up" into a "person who is learning and improving the system."

The Beautiful, Human Cycle

The git push and the git revert are two sides of the same coin: courage.

It takes courage to put your work out there, to be judged, to be used. And it takes courage to admit when you're wrong, to undo your work, and to try again.

This cycle isn't a pathology; it's the very engine of progress. It's the scientific method in action: hypothesize (git commit), experiment (git push), observe the results (production is on fire), and refine your hypothesis (git revert and try again).

So the next time you feel that sweet dopamine hit of a successful push, savor it. You've earned it.

And the next time you feel the cold agony of a revert, remember: you are not alone. Every single developer who has ever done meaningful work has been there. It doesn't mark the end of your contribution. It's just the universe asking you to refine your craft.

The real victory isn't a perfect git log with no revert commits. The real victory is having the resilience to push again tomorrow.

---

What about you? What's the most memorable git push high or git revert low you've ever experienced? Share your story in the comments—let's normalize the rollercoaster. 👇