1 — Why Libra exists (our north star)
When we first sketched Libra, our goal was simple: give small and mid-sized businesses the same reliable labelling tools that large enterprises use, but without the baffling price tags or long lead times. The site needed to be both a storefront for custom self-adhesive labels and an operational portal that made ordering, technical support, and integration with barcode printers unmistakably easy for buyers and technicians. The product lineup includes self-adhesive labels, thermal transfer ribbons, barcode printers and price-marking equipment, plus specialist items like linerless scale labels — all packaged so a purchasing manager or store owner can find what they need quickly and confidently.
That dual role — e-commerce and technical documentation/support hub — shaped every major decision we made, from the information architecture to the programming languages we used.
2 — Our audience and product thinking
Libra isn’t just a product catalogue. Our target users are:
Operations managers who need high-volume industrial label solutions.
Retail teams looking for price marking and till roll supplies.
Warehouse & logistics teams requiring robust barcode printing.
Food retailers and butchers who need scale/linerless labels.
Small businesses who want desktop printers and quick turnaround.
From this mix we derived three product imperatives: clarity (no jargon for buyers), accuracy (spec sheets and compatibility matter), and reliability (technical content + support). Those imperatives guided the content, the backend architecture, and the tooling we produced for the in-house team.
3 — Tech stack: why Python + C++
We chose a two-language approach on purpose.
Python is our workhorse for the web, integrations, and automation:
Fast development for the web frontend and API layers.
Rich ecosystem for e-commerce (cart logic, order flows), data handling, and content generation.
Excellent support for server tasks: scheduled jobs, email, PDF invoices, and simple ETL of label templates.
C++ is where we turned to systems and hardware:
Printer drivers and low-level communication with industrial label printers demand deterministic performance and tight control over serial/USB/Ethernet protocols.
Real-time conversion and manipulation of print jobs (especially when we needed to generate ESC/POS or ZPL/TSPL streams programmatically) benefited from C++’s performance and existing libraries.
When we evaluated speed and memory footprint for batch label generation (millions of labels in a production run), C++ delivered predictable latency.
That split allowed us to iterate quickly on the web product while still delivering machine-level reliability for printer interfacing and heavy lifting.
4 — Overall architecture (high level)
Our architecture is organized into clear layers:
Frontend (React + server templates)
Lightweight React components for product pages, quote forms, and a small admin dashboard. SEO-friendly server-rendered pages for catalogue content.
API & backend (Python / FastAPI)
Manages product data, quotes, order flows, user authentication, and integrations (accounting, shipping).
Print engine (C++ service)
A local/remote daemon responsible for converting label templates into printer commands (ZPL, TSPL, ESC/POS) and handling communication retries, spool management, and ribbon/stock checks.
Database & storage
PostgreSQL for relational data, Redis for job queues, and object storage for artwork and generated PDFs.
CI/CD & infrastructure
Dockerized services, automated builds, and deployment pipelines. A mix of on-prem resources for physical print testing and cloud for scalable web components.
This separation kept the web team agile and the hardware team focused.
5 — How we use Python (concrete duties)
Python was the obvious choice for web and orchestration tasks:
Product CMS & content generation: the product pages and "Printers Bulletin" content are managed in a Python-backed CMS that lets non-technical staff update spec sheets and publish guides.
Quote engine: customers request custom label quotes (size, material, adhesive, finish, quantity). Python computes cost models that incorporate material waste, press setup time, and finishing (die-cut, perforation, varnish).
Order workflows: order validation, printing tickets, shipping labels, and invoicing.
Integration: email providers, payment gateways, and CRM hooks.
Automation scripts: batch resizing of artwork, preflight checks on incoming designs, and generating proofs as PDFs.
Python’s libraries for image handling, PDF generation, and web frameworks made these tasks straightforward to implement and maintain.
6 — Why C++ for printer and driver work (concrete duties)
Although most web code lives in Python, we needed native performance and deterministic memory usage for device communication:
Printer protocol translation: converting print templates into printer languages at high throughput (for industrial printers) required optimized code paths. The C++ service compiles templates into minimal instruction streams.
Low-level port handling: USB/serial buffers, flow control, and robust error recovery are easier to manage at the system level where you can control bytes precisely.
Real-time queueing: in a factory setting labels must print in exact sequences; C++ enables a low-latency spooler that Python can delegate to.
SDKs and vendor APIs: many printer SDKs ship with C/C++ bindings, so integrating advanced functionality (firmware updates, sensor queries, ribbon autosensing) was painless.
The C++ module exposes a stable, simple API the Python backend talks to over a local socket or via gRPC for remote print farms.
7 — Design, UX and content priorities
Because a buyer often arrives with a problem — “I need scale labels for meat that survive freezing and scanning” — our content had to answer questions simply:
Product pages show materials, application examples, compatibility (printer models), recommended ribbons, and expected lifespan.
A "Printers Bulletin" explains difference between direct thermal and thermal transfer — so customers select the correct printer and ribbons for their environment.
Quick quote forms: size, qty, and finishing produce a response within a business day.
A technical FAQ addresses common questions like recommended ribbon types (wax, wax-resin, resin), core sizes, and label roll diameters.
Content and UX were tightly coupled: good copy reduces technical support load and increases conversion.
8 — Manufacturing & supply chain visibility
We had to make the website reflect real production realities:
Product availability: stock levels for common sizes were surfaced on the site; custom runs required lead-time estimates.
Lead time calculator: customers selecting a combination of special finishes, adhesives and materials see an estimated production date inline with the quote.
Waste and roll planning: our quote engine models waste (e.g., die-cut kerf, start/stop losses) so customers get realistic pricing.
This transparency reduced email churn and improved trust with repeat customers.
9 — Integration with barcode printers & ribbons
A major engineering focus was compatibility information and on-site support for barcode printers and thermal transfer ribbons, because these are core to user success.
We built:
A searchable compatibility matrix mapping label materials to printers and ribbon types.
A small diagnostic tool (runs in the browser + backend) that helps clients check printer connectivity and print a test label.
Documentation for selecting ribbon grades (wax, wax-resin, resin) and troubleshooting common smear or adhesion problems.
Because barcode printers come in many brands and models, this compatibility work dramatically reduced returns and support tickets.
Libra
+1
10 — Real problems we faced during creation (and how we solved them)
We hit lots of real, teachable problems — some technical, some operational. Here are the most significant ones and how we addressed them.
Problem A — Matching web expectations to factory reality
Issue: Customers want immediate proofing and very specific materials, but production has physical constraints (press widths, minimum order quantities, adhesive lead times).
Fix: We built a production rules engine in Python that enforces constraints in the quote path (e.g., warns when requested width exceeds press capacity) and presents alternatives. This reduced "unfillable" orders and sped up the quoting cycle.
Problem B — Printer language fragmentation
Issue: Different printers use different languages (ZPL, TSPL, EPL). Some vendors expose inconsistent behaviours under heavy load.
Fix: We centralized conversion: designers upload vector artwork; a C++ print engine compiles an optimized command stream for the target printer. The engine runs hardware tests during onboarding to calibrate heuristics per model. This lowered failed print jobs substantially.
Problem C — Artwork fidelity and color expectations
Issue: Customers upload artwork that looks fine on screen but fails on the press (wrong color profiles, low DPI, transparent layers).
Fix: Implemented preflight checks in Python that automatically detect common issues and offer corrective steps or auto-fixes (rasterizing certain effects, embedding fonts). The system can send a proof PDF that accurately represents print output.
Problem D — Thermal ribbon and label pairing issues
Issue: Choosing the wrong ribbon leaves prints that smudge or fade, and customers often couldn't describe the failure well enough for remote diagnosis.
Fix: Created an online troubleshooting guide and a small diagnostic form where customers select observed symptoms; the system suggests ribbon grades and likely causes. We added labeled demo kits for local pickup so clients can physically test.
Problem E — Real-time stock & lead time accuracy
Issue: Inventory is dynamic; printing consumables and custom runs make lead times variable.
Fix: We instrumented the factory floor (simple ERP hooks) and connected production schedules to the site’s lead-time calculator so customers see realistic estimates. This raised customer satisfaction and reduced surprise inquiries.
11 — Security, compliance, and data handling
Security and compliance were non-negotiable, particularly for customer data and PCI-adjacent flows (payments and invoices):
HTTPS everywhere, HSTS, and Content Security Policies for the site.
PCI-compliant third-party payment processors — our system never stores raw card data.
Role-based access control in the admin panel for pricing and order management.
Secure file handling and virus scanning for uploaded artwork.
Audit logs for order edits and certificate generation for batches (useful for traceability).
We also made sure that the “contact / quotation” flows were simple but logged for compliance and service quality.
12 — Testing & QA (how we validated the product)
Quality assurance was hands-on because printers and materials respond to subtle environmental differences:
Automated unit and integration tests for the Python backend and conversion routines.
Hardware regression labs: physical tests for printers, ribbons, and sample rolls; we run nightly print jobs from the C++ spooler to verify no regressions.
Proof approvals: customers approve PDFs before production; for returning customers with consistent specs, we offered a “fast track” checkbox.
Field testing: we deployed test kits to key clients to validate real world performance (wash tests, freezer tests, abrasion tests).
Combining automated test coverage with physical tests caught many edge cases that pure software testing would miss.
13 — Performance engineering & scaling
The web traffic for product browsing is moderate, but the load spikes during B2B buying cycles and product announcements. We designed for:
Horizontal scaling of the Python API (stateless services behind a load balancer).
Job queue for heavy tasks (file processing, batch proofs) with Redis + worker fleet.
Rate-limiting for API endpoints that trigger hardware work (the print engine) to avoid accidental overload.
The C++ print engine itself was designed as a clustered service — one instance per print farm — so bottlenecks are isolated and observable.
14 — SEO, content strategy and the “Printers Bulletin”
We built a content strategy to educate and capture search intent — “how to choose ribbons,” “difference direct thermal vs thermal transfer,” and “label materials for freezing” were canonical topics. This not only helped users but improved organic discovery for the shop side of the business. The “Printers Bulletin” section became a central resource for troubleshooting and best practices, lowering technical support load while improving conversions.
Libra
+1
15 — Operational learnings from customer interactions
Hands-on service taught us how customers think:
They want clear compatibility statements: which printer + which ribbon + which label stock = success.
They appreciate demo packs and small sample orders before committing to large runs.
Turnaround transparency (lead times and shipping options) is more important than small price differences.
We reworked the quote flow multiple times to reflect this: the simpler and more honest the flow, the better the outcomes.
16 — Accessibility and localization
Our user base is primarily local (South Africa), so accessibility and local context mattered:
Localised business hours, contact number prominence, and trade terms (VAT, shipping) were carefully displayed where relevant.
The site follows accessibility best practices (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation) because technical documentation must be usable by everyone — warehouse staff often use tablets on the factory floor in loud environments.
17 — Monitoring and observability
We instrumented the system to watch for operational issues:
Error reporting (Sentry) for backend exceptions.
Application performance monitoring for slow endpoints.
Metrics exported from the print engine for queue depth, spool time, and failure rates.
Business KPIs: quote conversion, average lead time, and repeat customer rate.
These signals informed product priorities and engineering sprints.
18 — Pricing strategy and cost modeling
Unlike purely digital products, printing involves physical economics:
Minimum order quantities and setup costs (die cutting, changeovers) are explicit in the pricing model.
Our quote engine models economies of scale, material costs, and press run lengths; it suggests optimal roll sizes and quantities to reduce per-label cost.
We offer options like “preflight only” or “proof + print” so customers choose risk tolerance versus speed.
The transparency of costs builds trust and creates predictable margins.
19 — Marketing & sales approach
Our go-to-market mixes inbound education with targeted B2B outreach:
SEO and the printers bulletin attract organic discovery.
Demo kits and trade show presence drive direct sales to grocery and butcher chains.
A small inside sales team follows up on quote leads with technical calls — this human touch dramatically increases conversion on complex orders.
20 — The future roadmap (our goals for the site and the product)
We view the website as a living product. Here are the main themes on our roadmap:
Short-term (next 6–12 months)
Improved configurator: a visual label builder so users can design simple labels online and see real-time material / price effects.
Expanded compatibility data: adding more printer models and automated vendor tests.
Client dashboards: allow businesses to reorder frequently used SKUs in a single click and see past run specs.
Medium-term (12–24 months)
API for integration: B2B partners (POS vendors, ERP systems) will be able to request order placements and retrieve proofs programmatically.
On-site VIN/asset tagging service: a managed service for fleets and asset heavy customers where we deliver pre-printed, serialized tags.
Sustainability options: expand linerless and recycled material offerings and show lifecycle impact estimates for materials.
Long-term (2+ years)
Predictive procurement: offer subscriptions and replenishment based on usage patterns so customers never run out of critical consumables.
Distributed print network: connect certified partner printers in major metros to provide same-day local fulfilment.
Machine learning for defect detection: analyze images from test prints and customer returns to automatically identify root causes (bad ribbon, wrong material, pressure issues).
These goals reduce friction for clients and open new revenue streams beyond one-off label orders.
21 — Business metrics we care about
Success metrics we use to measure progress:
Quote-to-order conversion rate.
Average lead time vs promised lead time.
Repeat purchase rate for consumables (ribbons, till rolls, etc.).
Support ticket volume per 1,000 orders.
Gross margin by product category.
Monitoring these KPIs guides trade-offs between speed, margin, and new product investments.
22 — Sustainability & materials roadmap
Labeling is physical: consumables matter. We curated and plan to expand sustainable choices:
Linerless options for scale labels to reduce backing waste.
Recyclable and FSC-certified paper for certain label families.
Education to help customers choose materials with lower lifecycle impact for their use case.
Sustainability is both a product differentiation and a cost management tool.
23 — Team & culture that built Libra
This project was cross-functional: product managers, frontend and backend engineers, C++ systems programmers, print technicians, and a small operations team. That diversity was essential — the product lives between the physical and the digital. We invested in shared vocabulary so engineers and press operators could communicate precisely about “stock thickness,” “printhead dwell,” and “die clearance.”
24 — Lessons for similar projects
If you’re building a site that blends digital & hardware, we offer three fast lessons:
Automate the obvious — preflight checks, compatibility matrices, and rule engines will remove repetitive support queries.
Instrument the physical world — connect the factory floor to the web product; nothing improves estimates like real production data.
Respect real-time constraints — hardware communication and print conversion should be separated from web request lifecycles (use job queues and a spooler).
These practices preserve developer velocity while ensuring production reliability.
25 — A short FAQ we added to reduce friction
Q: How do I know which ribbon to choose?
A: We link ribbon grades to application types (general purpose, smear-resistant, high-temperature). The site’s troubleshooting assistant suggests grades based on symptoms.
Q: Can I get a sample before ordering?
A: Yes — we offer sample kits and small proof runs for tight tolerances.
Q: What printers are supported?
A: Most common industrial and desktop models are covered; compatibility info lives on each product page and is verified during onboarding.
Libra
Q: How fast are custom runs?
A: Lead times are estimated during quoting and reflect press capacity, finishing, and current backlog.
26 — Final reflections: why we built it this way
Building the Libra website taught us that selling physical consumables well means much more than pretty product pages. It requires engineering for real-world constraints, careful content that educates, and operation systems that connect the shop floor to the buyer’s expectations. Using Python allowed us to iterate fast on the web product; using C++ let us solve the hard problems where timing and precision mattered. Customers rewarded clarity and speed with loyalty, and our engineering choices paid off in lower returns and higher conversion.
27 — Where we go next (short, concrete milestones)
Launch the visual configurator and client dashboards.
Add three new automated compatibility tests for major printer models.
Pilot distributed fulfilment in two major metros to test same-day fulfilment viability.
Expand linerless and recycled stock options and publish lifecycle comparisons.
Appendix: selected implementation details (technical notes)
Print engine API: gRPC endpoint that accepts a template + variable dataset and returns a signed print job ID and spool status. Retries are idempotent and use job tokens to prevent duplicate prints.
Asset pipeline: vector artwork is sanitized, fonts embedded, and jobs rasterized for device-specific DPI in Python prior to handing off to the C++ spooler.
Traceability: each production batch gets a JSON manifest containing material lot numbers, ribbon batch, press operator, and a link to the proof PDF.
DevOps: CI builds container images; production deployment runs in an orchestrated cluster with blue/green deploys for web and rolling restarts for the C++ spooler.
Closing — an invitation
Building Libra has been an engineering journey and a lesson in practical product design. We built a site that’s more than a catalogue: it’s a live operational tool for teams that depend on labels for their business. If you’re working on a similar hardware-adjacent product, the lessons above reflect what worked for us: automate where possible, instrument what you can, and never silo the people who touch the physical product from the people who build the software.
Top comments (0)