I'm on mobile right now, when I get a chance I'll run it on my laptop, but knowing that both loops act differently and for in might cause inconstancy is a great point towards each.
I believe there are use cases for the for .. in syntax right?
So I don't have anything against the for .. in syntax personally, but no, there are no special use cases for it. I mean, I'm sure if you tried you could construct a situation where for might be preferable to .each, but really, it's presence in the language at this point is just vestigial.
I'm not sure I've ever seen it used outside of a tutorial.
I was amused to see that Crystal-lang went so far as to remove it altogether.
Given this:
I would say, yeah there's not much of a difference in terms of readability.
BUT there is a good reason. Try running this code example:
Basically,
for..in
loop can redefine things that you didn't intend to, and that can cause problems.Reference: Tutorials Point - Ruby Loops
I'm on mobile right now, when I get a chance I'll run it on my laptop, but knowing that both loops act differently and for in might cause inconstancy is a great point towards each.
Thank you
So I don't have anything against the
for .. in
syntax personally, but no, there are no special use cases for it. I mean, I'm sure if you tried you could construct a situation wherefor
might be preferable to.each
, but really, it's presence in the language at this point is just vestigial.I'm not sure I've ever seen it used outside of a tutorial.
I was amused to see that Crystal-lang went so far as to remove it altogether.
Hey Andy, I just ran the code and it really makes much more sense to use
each
method. I believe there are use cases for thefor .. in
syntax right?Anyway, thank you for the information.