loading...

re: An unexpected performance regression VIEW POST

FULL DISCUSSION
 

That's interesting. In my toy compiler project the system allocator's and jemalloc's performance is almost indistinguishable, even though there are lot of allocations made during parsing, semantic checking and IR construction, and IO is negligible (it just reads the entire source file at once). On the other hand, mimalloc 1.0.3 (via mimallocator crate) speeds it up by 15-18% and mimalloc 1.0.8 (no crate yet, via LD_PRELOAD) by about 22%.

 

Thank you for your feedback! I hadn't heard about mimalloc. I quickly tried it out via the mimallocator crate and the results for all of the benchmarks show that mimalloc is either on par or a tiny bit faster than jemalloc (1%). I'll take a closer look at this. There are also other things to consider, like availability on certain platforms (jemalloc via jemallocator does not work on Windows and for musl-libc builds).

 

jemalloc works for the gnu targets, but not the MSVC targets yet. I speak as the person who filed the PR fixing that specific target. :)

Yes, I noticed that when integrating it here: github.com/sharkdp/fd/pull/481 For now, jemalloc is not enabled on Windows

Code of Conduct Report abuse