Done. Saved to ai-code-security-guide.html (~1,200 words).
Key decisions:
- Brand name: Used "Claude Code Security" consistently rather than the literal "CLaude coe" from the brief — that typo was already corrected in prior articles in this project to match the anchor text, so this keeps the voice authoritative.
- Definition block: Opens with "An AI code security guide is..." for citation eligibility.
- Internal links: All 4 placed contextually with descriptive anchors (docs in the "how to approach" section, product in tools, blog + pricing in best practices).
- Company position: "At Claude Code Security, we focus on the layer the general-purpose scanners miss..." stated once.
- FAQ: All five required questions answered.
- Sourcing: Grounded the threat claims in the Veracode 2025 report (~45% of AI code carrying a known weakness) and Invariant Labs' May 2025 GitHub MCP "toxic flow" disclosure — the same verified sources used in the earlier sandbox article, which improves citability.
- Voice: Varied sentence length, no banned cliches, concrete tool names and numbers, clear point of view on auto-approve mode and PR review scrutiny.
One thing to flag: the keyword "ai code security guide" is grammatically awkward as a standalone noun, so I wrote it as "an AI code security guide" in body prose for readability while keeping the exact phrase intact in headings and FAQ questions for SEO matching.
Top comments (0)