DEV Community

Cover image for Why GraphQL Is Gaining Adoption
Dauda Lawal
Dauda Lawal

Posted on • Originally published at blog.stackademic.com

Why GraphQL Is Gaining Adoption

APIs enable teams to integrate services and speed up development, regardless of whether you’re creating a mobile app or a SaaS product. However, as frontends become more demanding and systems become more distributed, it’s clear that traditional API approaches have limitations.

GraphQL is becoming a popular choice, making development easier.

So why are so many teams switching to GraphQL?

Why REST APIs Fall Short

REST has long been the standard approach for organizing APIs. REST brought structure with endpoints and HTTP verbs. However, as frontend needs evolved, REST’s limitations began to create friction.

1. Over-fetching and under-fetching data

A general issue with REST APIs is that endpoints return too much or too little information. For example, a mobile app that shows a user profile might only need a user’s name and avatar, but the REST endpoint could return the entire profile object with many unnecessary fields. Conversely, if multiple pieces of related data are needed, the client might have to make numerous round trips to stitch everything together.

2. Rigid endpoint design

REST APIs force teams to plan use cases upfront. Once endpoints are exposed and consumed, changing them risks breaking clients. This lack of flexibility creates problems between evolving backend data models and the need to keep APIs backward compatible.

3. Complexity at scale

Modern applications usually rely on microservices, each with its own API. A frontend developer trying to build a dashboard might need to fetch data from five different services. Without a central query layer, this leads to extra client-side work and fragile code.

4. Performance tradeoffs

Especially on mobile or low-bandwidth networks, making multiple API calls is expensive. Developers often work around this with ad-hoc aggregation layers, but these solutions add extra work.

REST works, but its limitations and inefficiencies become more obvious as applications scale and client expectations rise.

What Teams Tried Before GraphQL

Before GraphQL, teams tried different strategies to alleviate REST’s pain points:

  • Custom endpoints for specific use cases

Backend teams commonly built “fat” endpoints tailored to particular frontend needs. This solves over-fetching but creates maintenance overhead. Over the years, APIs expanded with too many specialized endpoints.

  • Backend-for-frontend (BFF) pattern

Companies like Netflix popularized the BFF approach: create separate API layers designed for each client (web, iOS, Android). While this improves flexibility, it increases engineering costs, since every new client might require its own tailored backend.

  • API Gateways and aggregation layers

API gateways can collect data from multiple microservices into a single response. However, this adds another layer to manage, and developers still lack fine-grained control over the exact shape of data returned.

Each of these solutions addresses part of the problem, but none gives the flexibility needed without introducing significant issues.

What Makes GraphQL Different

Facebook built GraphQL in 2012 (open-sourced in 2015), and it changed how developers approach APIs. Instead of rigid endpoints, GraphQL exposes a typed schema describing available data and operations.

Clients send queries specifying exactly what they want, and the server returns precisely that nothing more, nothing less.

A typical GraphQL query looks like this:

query {
  user(id: "123") {
    name
    avatar
    posts(limit: 5) {
      title
      createdAt
    }
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The response mirrors the query structure:

{
  "data": {
    "user": {
      "name": "Dauda Lawal",
      "avatar": "https://examplecase.com/avatar.jpg",
      "posts": [
        { "title": "Hello Welcome GraphQL", "createdAt": "2025-09-30" },
        ...
      ]
    }
  }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This approach has some clear benefits:

  • Fetching Precise Data: GraphQL allows clients to request only the fields they need, which reduces payload size and conserves resources, especially in low-bandwidth environments.

  • Single Query Across Multiple Sources: Modern applications frequently pull data from microservices, databases, and third-party APIs. GraphQL combines these sources into a single query, reducing the need for multiple REST calls and simplifying frontend logic.

  • Schema and Typing: GraphQL APIs are defined by a schema with strict typing, making them self-descriptive, consistent, and validated by default. This schema-first approach minimizes errors and provides predictable interfaces.

  • Live updates: GraphQL subscriptions deliver live updates when data changes, enabling interactive use cases such as chat applications and analytics dashboards, something REST usually struggles with.

  • Introspection and Tooling: GraphQL supports introspection, allowing developers to query the schema itself. With tools like GraphiQL, Apollo Studio, and Relay, onboarding is improved and development is made easier.

Why Developers Actually Like GraphQL

1. Improved Developer Experience

Frontend developers love GraphQL because it gives them direct control over the data they receive. They no longer need to wait for backend teams to create new endpoints. The self-documenting schema and tooling ecosystem (GraphiQL, Apollo, Relay) speed up development cycles.

2. Faster responses

Mobile apps with constrained bandwidth benefit from fewer round trips and reduced payload sizes. This results in faster load times and better user experiences.

3. Unifying distributed systems

GraphQL can sit in front of multiple microservices or databases, acting as a single entry point. This reduces client-side problems and provides a standardized interface even as backend systems change.

4. Faster updates

Because GraphQL separates frontend queries from backend implementations, teams can continue to work on UI/UX without backend changes. This agility is particularly valuable in rapidly evolving product teams.

4. Lots of companies are using it now

Companies like Shopify, GitHub, and Airbnb have adopted GraphQL, bringing visibility and maturity to the ecosystem. The technology has matured, with production-ready servers (Apollo, GraphQL Yoga, and Hasura) and integrations for popular frameworks.

5. Real-Time Functionality

With subscriptions, GraphQL enables live updates for features like notifications and collaborative tools, use cases where REST typically struggles.

Things to Watch Out For

GraphQL isn’t a silver bullet. Teams adopting it for projects should consider these points:

  • Server-side complexity: Writing resolvers that fetch and stitch data can be complex, especially in large schemas. Without careful design, performance can suffer.

  • Caching challenges: REST’s resource-based design maps neatly to HTTP caching. GraphQL queries are more dynamic, making caching harder (though persisted queries and tools like Apollo Cache help).

  • Security and authorization: clients can ask for arbitrary data, authorization logic must be carefully enforced at the field level. Without barriers, sensitive data could be exposed.

  • Learning curve: Teams must learn a new approach. While the positive aspects are clear, GraphQL adoption requires changes in how teams work.

Why It’s Important Now

GraphQL’s rise aligns with broader industry trends:

  • API-first approach: As companies shift to composable architectures, APIs are productized, and developer experience becomes a significant feature.

  • Microservices and complexity: With backends divided into many services, a unified query layer like GraphQL reduces integration problems.

  • Frontend-driven development: In an era of rich, dynamic UIs, empowering frontend teams to regulate data access accelerates innovation.

  • Cloud and edge computing: Efficient data transfer is significant when apps run on distributed infrastructure and diverse client devices.

Conclusion

GraphQL improves the way teams build software today, which requires a flexible and user-focused approach. By giving developers precise data fetching and improving the developer experience, it has become a useful tool for modern applications. GraphQL won’t replace REST completely, many situations still favour traditional APIs, but for data-rich applications where flexibility and performance matter, GraphQL has become a go-to for many teams.

Thanks for reading!

If you’d like to connect, you can reach me here:

📩 Email: Daslaw26@gmail.com
🔗 LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/daslaw26

Top comments (0)