Pick one. You can't say one is difficult and complicated and nobody will understand it.
And the other one is surprising, rarely taught or known but way easier to understand?
Please explain how your method is "way easier than .map()"?
I just don't understand your thinking here, the concepts are exactly the same, the syntax is almost exactly the same (actually longer), and you're introducing a somewhat unfamiliar syntax to most to achieve something that everyone likely understands already with .map().
Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Map an array without .map()
Pick one. You can't say one is difficult and complicated and nobody will understand it.
And the other one is surprising, rarely taught or known but way easier to understand?
Actually, I really like that method and it is way easier than
.map(), that's why I recommended that, but noted! Thanks for reading the articlePlease explain how your method is "way easier than .map()"?
I just don't understand your thinking here, the concepts are exactly the same, the syntax is almost exactly the same (actually longer), and you're introducing a somewhat unfamiliar syntax to most to achieve something that everyone likely understands already with .map().