DEV Community

Cover image for 8 JavaScript Tips & Tricks That No One Teaches 🚀
Garvit Motwani for World In Dev

Posted on • Updated on

8 JavaScript Tips & Tricks That No One Teaches 🚀

JavaScript is no doubt one of the coolest languages in the world and is gaining more and more popularity day by day. So the developer community has found some tricks and tips after using JS for quite a while now. Today I will share 8 Tips & Tricks With You!

So let's get started

Functional Inheritance

Functional inheritance is the process of receiving features by applying an augmenting function to an object instance. The function supplies a closure scope which you can use to keep some data private. The augmenting function uses dynamic object extension to extend the object instance with new properties and methods.

They look like:

// Base function
function Drinks(data) {
  var that = {}; // Create an empty object
  that.name = data.name; // Add it a "name" property
  return that; // Return the object
};

// Fuction which inherits from the base function
function Coffee(data) {
  // Create the Drinks object
  var that = Drinks(data);
  // Extend base object
  that.giveName = function() {
    return 'This is ' + that.name;
  };
  return that;
};

// Usage
var firstCoffee = Coffee({ name: 'Cappuccino' });
console.log(firstCoffee.giveName());
// Output: "This is Cappuccino"
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Credits to @loverajoel for explaining this topic in depth here - Functional Inheritance on JS Tips which I've paraphrased above

.map() Substitute

.map() also has a substitute that we can use which is .from():

let dogs = [
    { name: Rio, age: 2 },
    { name: Mac, age: 3 },
    { name: Bruno, age: 5 },
    { name: Jucas, age: 10 },
    { name: Furr, age: 8 },
    { name: Blu, age: 7 },
]


let dogsNames = Array.from(dogs, ({name}) => name);
console.log(dogsNames); // returns [“Rio”, “Mac”, “Bruno”, “Jucas”, “Furr”, “Blu”]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Number to string/string to number

Usually, to convert a string to a number, we use something like this:

let num = 4
let newNum = num.toString();
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

and to convert a string to a number, we use:

let num = "4"
let stringNumber = Number(num);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

but what we can use to code fast is:

let num = 15;
let numString = num + ""; // number to string
let stringNum = +s; // string to number
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Using length to resize and emptying an array

In javascript, we can override a built-in method called length and assign it a value of our choice.

Let's look at an example:

let array_values = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8];  
console.log(array_values.length); 
// 8  
array_values.length = 5;  
console.log(array_values.length); 
// 5  
console.log(array_values); 
// [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

It can also be used in emptying an array, like this:

let array_values = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8]; 
console.log(array_values.length); 
// 8  
array_values.length = 0;   
console.log(array_values.length); 
// 0 
console.log(array_values); 
// []
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Swap Values with Array Destructuring.

The destructuring assignment syntax is a JavaScript expression that makes it possible to unpack values from arrays, or properties from objects, into distinct variables. We can also use that to swap values fast, like this:

let a = 1, b = 2
[a, b] = [b, a]
console.log(a) // result -> 2
console.log(b) // result -> 1
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Remove duplicates from an Array

This trick is pretty simple. Let's say, I made an array that is containing numbers, strings, and booleans, but the values are repeating themselves more than once and I want to remove the duplicates. So what I can do is:

const array = [1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, true, false, true, 'Kio', 2, 3];
const filteredArray = [...new Set(array)];
console.log(filteredArray) // [1, 3, 2, true, false, "Kio"]
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Short For Loop

You can write less code for a loop like this:

const names = ["Kio", "Rio", "Mac"];

// Long Version
for (let i = 0; i < names.length; i++) {
  const name = names[i];
  console.log(name);
}

// Short Version
for (let name of names) console.log(name);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Performance

In JS you can also get the time that the code was executed in like Google does:

google example

It looks like this:

const firstTime = performance.now();
something();
const secondTime = performance.now();
console.log(`The something function took ${secondTime - firstTime} milliseconds.`);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

⚡️ Giveaway ⚡️

We are giving away any course you need on Udemy. Any price any course.
Steps to enter the giveaway
--> React to this post
--> Subscribe to our Newsletter <-- Very important
--> Follow me on Twitter <-- x2 Chances of winning

The winner will be announced on May 1, Via Twitter


Thank you very much for reading this article.

Comment any tricks & tips you know!

PLEASE LIKE, SHARE, AND COMMENT

Follow me on Dev and Twitter

Top comments (80)

Collapse
 
devtalhaakbar profile image
Muhammad Talha Akbar • Edited

Great, Garvit! It's always great to know the language so well and bring about these unconventional ways to solve problems. However, it's always recommended to write code that is self-explanatory. And, I find majority of these tricks to be confusing (to an average eye). Use them when you really have to and leave a comment to make your intention clear.

Collapse
 
strativd profile image
Strat Barrett

On that note – which I completely agree with – it's interesting how readable this is Array.from(dogs) compared to dogs.map() if map wasn't so widely adopted :)

Collapse
 
arealsamurai profile image
An actual, Real Samurai • Edited

On that note, I'd love to see how performant Array.from() is compared to .map() that I know doesn't perform very well

Thread Thread
 
killshot13 profile image
Michael R.

Now you've inspired a more ambitious project. Building a custom standalone performance measurement tool for Javascript.

It could be something similar to Runkit, but strictly for benchmarking the various methods and approaches to the same end goal. Like which is faster?

capsLockNames = names.map(capitalize)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

OR

capsLockNames= []
for x = 0; x < names.length; x++
  capsLockNames[x] = capitalize(names[x]))
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

🤔🤔🤔

Thread Thread
 
arealsamurai profile image
An actual, Real Samurai

I can tell you for sure that the for loop is way more performant than map. But if you do compare everything, I'm definitely interested to read.

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Noted! and thanks for reading the article!

Collapse
 
davidsanwald profile image
Info Comment hidden by post author - thread only accessible via permalink
David Sanwald

Map an array without .map()

Pick one. You can't say one is difficult and complicated and nobody will understand it.
And the other one is surprising, rarely taught or known but way easier to understand?

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Actually, I really like that method and it is way easier than .map(), that's why I recommended that, but noted! Thanks for reading the article

Collapse
 
nickjohnmorton profile image
Nick Morton

Please explain how your method is "way easier than .map()"?

I just don't understand your thinking here, the concepts are exactly the same, the syntax is almost exactly the same (actually longer), and you're introducing a somewhat unfamiliar syntax to most to achieve something that everyone likely understands already with .map().

Collapse
 
shadowtime2000 profile image
Info Comment hidden by post author - thread only accessible via permalink
shadowtime2000

8 JavaScript Tips & Tricks That No One Teaches 🚀

This title makes it seem like these are tips and tricks worthwhile to use that are not that popular but extremely useful.

Most of these tips are actually well known among JS developers and aren't ones "That No One Teaches", such as the performance tip, the short for loop, using sets to remove duplicates from arrays, and swapping values with destructuring. The only ones that aren't as known are the first couple, which don't seem to be that useful.

Sorry, if that sounds rude because that isn't my intention. I am just trying to point out that most of these tips are either well known or not useful and the title is pretty misleading then.

Collapse
 
johannchopin profile image
johannchopin

You're right and I like your avatar👍

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Thanks! I don’t remember how I created that

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Noted

Collapse
 
sonterix profile image
Nick • Edited

Also, u can convert number to string in this way:

const num = 32
const str = `${32}`
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

That is interesting and thanks for sharing!!

Collapse
 
aalencar profile image
Alexandre Alencar

or

num + ''

Collapse
 
sonterix profile image
Nick

This method described in the article :/

Collapse
 
vladimirc profile image
Vladimir C

I believe you meant

const str = `${num}`
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
Collapse
 
peerreynders profile image
peerreynders

Array.from is notable for its intended use of making Array-like data iterable with array methods, such as strings.

There's another case where it is extremely handy - creating a fresh array with elements initialized from a function.

const init = (_value, index) => (index + 1) * 3;
const length = 4;
const array = Array.from({ length }, init); // [3, 6, 9, 12]
for (let i = 0; i < length; i += 1) console.assert(array[i] === (i + 1) * 3);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The issue with Array.prototype.fill() is that:

  • it requires an existing array (to modify)
  • it only places a single constant value into all the elements it replaces.

And Array.prototype.map() requires an already initialized array.

With Array.from() an array can be created and initialized with element content that varies by index in one fell swoop.

Collapse
 
lkarabeg profile image
lkarabeg

I kind of disagree, finding map much more readable.
Array.from({length: 4}).map((_value, index) => (index + 1) * 3)

Thread Thread
 
peerreynders profile image
peerreynders

With

const array = (new Array(length)).fill().map(init);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

it always ground my gears that to arrive at the desired array another disposable array had to be created and "filled" just to convey that I want length elements. And

const array = (new Array(length)).fill();
array.forEach((_v, i, a) => {
  a[i] = (i + 1) * 3;
});
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

was clunky enough to make me want to use a for loop.

So if I'm are already using Array.from() I might as well use the optional mapFn and thisArg parameters.

function init(_value, index) {
  return (index + 1) * this.factor;
}

const config = { length: 4 };
const two = { factor: 2 };
const three = { factor: 3 };
const array2 = Array.from(config, init, two);
const array3 = Array.from(config, init, three);

const checkArray = (expected, actual) => {
  const actualMatches = (value, index) => value === actual[index];
  console.assert(
    expected.length === actual.length && expected.every(actualMatches),
    'array mismatch - expected: %o actual: %o',
    expected,
    actual
  );
};
const TWOS = [2, 4, 6, 8];
const THREES = [3, 6, 9, 12];
checkArray(TWOS, array2);
checkArray(THREES, array3);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

... but that's just me.

Collapse
 
lmorchard profile image
Les Orchard • Edited

I'd say that Array.from() isn't the most handy as a substitute for Array.map(). Rather, it's handy for transforming iterables that aren't already arrays.

Like, to get the names of commenters on this page, try this in the dev tools console:

Array.from(
  document.querySelectorAll('.js-comment-username'),
  el => el.textContent
)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The NodeList returned from document.querySelectorAll isn't an array, but this lets you convert it to an array while performing a transformation at the same time.

Collapse
 
yobretyo profile image
Bret

The problem with JavaScript is that.... it’s not taught “in context”, it’s mainly always a “console.log” that is used for the answer, instead of truly implementing it into real examples.... it’s been tough for me to learn it

Collapse
 
killshot13 profile image
Michael R.

Liquid syntax error: Tag '{%' was not properly terminated with regexp: /\%\}/

Collapse
 
vicropht profile image
Vicropht

Make projects to learn it! Helps a lot!!!

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Ya

Collapse
 
strativd profile image
Strat Barrett

I'm a big fan of !! which gets the boolean value of (pretty much) anything:

let truthiness = !!12       //=> true
let truthiness = !!0        //=> false
let truthiness = !!'string' //=> true
let truthiness = !!''       //=> false
// BUT LOOK OUT FOR OBJECTS... 👀
let truthiness = !![]       //=> true
let truthiness = !!{}       //=> true
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

! is the opposite so !! becomes the boolean value !! 😄

Collapse
 
parkio profile image
Chris

The Boolean() constructor is another great way to interpret falsey values.

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Thanks for sharing! 🙏🙏

Collapse
 
ychanov profile image
Yavor Chanov

Hi, thanks for the article.
I think there is a small mistake in the "Number to string/string to number" part...
The example for converting string to number is:
let num = "4"
let stringNumber = Number(s); //doesn't that have to be Number(num);?

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Welcome and Noted!!

Collapse
 
dannyengelman profile image
Info Comment hidden by post author - thread only accessible via permalink
Danny Engelman

Interesting to learn that:

let dogsNames = Array.from(dogs, ({name}) => name);

is not as complicated as:

let dogsNames = dogs.map( ({name}) => name );

BUT..
the documentation says the y parameter in Array.from(x,y,z) IS a mapFn
So yes, you do not type those 3 letters... but you still have to understand you are mapping an Array.

Since you mention the Performance API; this gives a very interesting result:

let dogs = [
    { name: "Rio" , age: 2 },
    { name: "Mac", age: 3 },
    { name: "Bruno", age: 5 },
    { name: "Jucas", age: 10 },
    { name: "Furr", age: 8 },
    { name: "Blu", age: 7 },
];

function performance(method) {
  const firstTime = performance.now();
  let dogsNames;
  for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
    if (method == 1) {
      dogsNames = Array.from(dogs, ({name}) => name);
    } else {
      dogsNames = dogs.map(({name}) => name);
    }
  }
  const secondTime = performance.now();
  console.log(`The something function took ${secondTime - firstTime} milliseconds.`);
}
performance(1);
performance(2);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
Collapse
 
crimsonmed profile image
Médéric Burlet

for performance you use dates but since you are using console.log you could use console.time()

console.time("track");
// do stuff
console.timeEnd("track")
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
Collapse
 
afif profile image
Info Comment hidden by post author - thread only accessible via permalink
Temani Afif

can you please remove the CSS tag since this post is not about CSS? thanks

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Ya sorry actually I wrote it before because I wanted to create a CSS post 😅 thanks for the reminder

Collapse
 
g0d profile image
George Delaportas (ViR4X)

G R E A T work...

There are also many other great tricks you can do to optimize code, add quality and also provide C#-like or JAVA-like paradigms to JavaScript.

Check my web framework and especially the JS extensions for more cool ideas.

github.com/g0d/micro-MVC
github.com/g0d/micro-MVC/tree/mast...

Collapse
 
ignaciojvig profile image
Info Comment hidden by post author - thread only accessible via permalink
João Victor Ignacio

Thanks for sharing Garvit! About your first topic, Functional Inheritance, I don't actually agree with what you've said. Since the idea is to hide the object within a function, it kinda works, BUT, that's totally different from the concept of 'private' as data encapsulation. You can still get the object and do whatever you want. All that you doing there is hiding an object inside another, and then retrieving it. Also, be careful when using 'var', especially when talking about concepts like hoisting and closures. Your variables were actually globally scoped and their memory will not be immediatly freed after using that function.

Collapse
 
garvitmotwani profile image
Garvit Motwani

Thanks For Sharing The Tip! Noted!

Collapse
 
macnick profile image
Nick Haralampopoulos

Nice article Garvit! I usually use the .map() substitute when creating arrays with pre-filled values. One little mistake though. array.length is a property in JavaScript not a method. It is a method in Java, C++ and others but not in JavaScript.
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/W...
Thank you again for the nice article.

Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more