It is not that Go needs x, but we don't code in MIPS and that is a very simple language.
On the specifics of generics, you utilize Java and C# as examples of languages people are just used to having generics. It took Java 10 years to add generics. And C# had a quick follow up in v2. So Go is positioned well to follow these languages.
I'm not sold on generics either. I'm sold on static typing and static meta programing.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
The challenge is that complexity exists. Where does the complexity live, in libraries? The language? The tool chain?
he-the-great.livejournal.com/49072...
It is not that Go needs x, but we don't code in MIPS and that is a very simple language.
On the specifics of generics, you utilize Java and C# as examples of languages people are just used to having generics. It took Java 10 years to add generics. And C# had a quick follow up in v2. So Go is positioned well to follow these languages.
I'm not sold on generics either. I'm sold on static typing and static meta programing.