Yes, it is indeed. It is also said that they should have been named the other way i.e setImmediate should have been named process.nextTick and vice versa.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Isn't it great how
setImmediateis less immediate thannextTickwhich isn't executed in the next tick but in the current? ðĪŠYes, it is indeed. It is also said that they should have been named the other way i.e
setImmediateshould have been namedprocess.nextTickand vice versa.