DEV Community

Damian Dixon
Damian Dixon

Posted on

We started benchmarking real provisioning speed on Kilawatt Cloud this week, and wanted to share the raw numbers instead of just claiming “fast.”

What we’re measuring: time from submitting a provisioning request to a genuinely usable instance (SSH actually reachable, not just an API saying “running”). Every test instance is torn down immediately after, so cost per run stays near zero.
Round 1 — cheapest available GPU:
• RunPod (RTX 4090): 7.2s-8.0s across 6 runs
• Vast.ai (mixed cards): 38.6s-575.0s across 7 runs, high variance since Vast is a peer-to-peer marketplace of many different hosts
Round 2 — pinned to the actual hardware our customers rent (H200, B200) on Vast.ai:
• H200: 93.1s cold start, then 21.0s and 20.7s once the host was warm
• B200: 197.0s cold start, then 41.3s and 26.0s once warm
The pattern we found interesting: the first run on any given host pays a real tax for the container image download. Once cached, subsequent runs land consistently in the 20-40s range regardless of GPU tier.
Sample size is still small (3 runs per GPU on the hardware-tier tests), so treat this as directional, not final. We’re running more to see if the cold-start pattern holds up. Full methodology and charts at kilawattcloud.dev if you want to dig in.





Top comments (0)