METAPhilosophy

Understanding MetaPhilosophy thoroughly in 1, 2 & 3

Page: METAPhilosophy
Relevance: Justified Cognitive

Philosophy ... Love of wisdom
META ... Beyond

🔰 MetaPhilosophy is Beyond the Love of Wisdom. What is Beyond the Love of Wisdom❓

🧩 Wisdom is Truth Itself & Truth Represents the Right Boundaries

🎯 Loving Wisdom Means Loving the Right Boundaries

Right Boundaries Provide Clarity So They Are Easily Understood

⭕️ Philosophy Loves Clarity, Not Accumulating Confusion (Polemic)

❇️ Going Beyond Clarity Means Foundational

❇️ Foundational Means Absolute, So MetaPhilosophy Goes Beyond Clarity Which Also Means At the Foundational Point

Which Also Means Being MetaPhilosophical Is Being at the Foundation - Absolute, So MetaPhilosophy Explores the Dimension of Absoluteness

UNDERSTANDING METAPHILOSOPHY EASILY

To make it easier to understand MetaPhilosophy❓

Exploring Absoluteness

MetaPhilosophy seeks to understand the fundamental wisdom of what is considered most fundamental.

Beyond Rationality

Despite rationality being considered the foundation of philosophical reasoning, even rationality is not easily understood if it is not realistic.

What is considered rational is sometimes difficult to understand realistically, except as mere overlapping logical conclusions.

Subjective-Objective

MetaPhilosophy must be able to see the objective side of the subjective, and see the subjective side of the objective.

So as not to mistakenly understand the concrete in an abstract way and vice versa, which would take it out of context.

Context & Perspective

MetaPhilosophy must be able to see context differently from perspective and not equate "different contexts" as "different perspectives," though they are different.

⭕️ THIS IS THE MAIN MISTAKE IN PHILOSOPHY THAT BECOMES THE ROOT OF MANY POLEMICS

Philosophical Ambiguity

MetaPhilosophy must be wary of ambiguity in philosophy, in order to find universal truth

Beyond Cause and Effect

MetaPhilosophy must reason beyond cause and effect (beyond relative logical consequences)

WORLD VIEW ON METAPHILOSOPHY

The Problem of METAPhilosophy❓

⭕️ They didn't grasp the concept of MetaPhilosophy. They only see METAPhilosophy as 'philosophy about philosophy'❓So ambiguous.

So, unlike what is generally known in the world that MetaPhilosophy is philosophy about philosophy❓Which is still ambiguous because they themselves are confused in formulating the concept of MetaPhilosophy and then their confusion considers MetaPhilosophy no different from or part of philosophy ❌

But actually ...

📌 SO, MetaPhilosophy fundamentally is

1⃣ ❇️

Tracing Universal Truth and Applying Knowledge Contextually

Practically ...

2⃣ ❇️

Reasoning Equally (Subjective-Objective) Based on Premises Beyond Cause and Effect (Absolute Logical Consequences)

Experimentation

This means that if previous philosophy only contemplated with thoughts far from experimentation, MetaPhilosophy must base its knowledge on experimental evidence or conduct experiments itself.

The difference between science and MetaPhilosophy is that if science seeks to find the truth of probability from the results of its experiments, MetaPhilosophy must be able to see the universal truth from its experimental results.

3⃣ ❇️

Fundamentally, MetaPhilosophy deals with universal absolute truth. Whatever is touched, studied, communicated, or approached by MetaPhilosophy, always seeks the underlying universal absolute truth. 📌

So it is time for science to trust philosophy through MetaPhilosophy, where their synergy will occur - sooner or later.

🔰 Science is the hand of MetaPhilosophy, and vice versa.

🔰 I THINK THIS IS ENOUGH TO EXPLAIN WHAT METAPHILOSOPHY IS