Securing Test Environments: Strategies for Eliminating Leaking PII with TypeScript

In modern development workflows, especially within CI/CD pipelines, test environments often handle sensitive data that, if improperly managed, can lead to privacy breaches. One recurring challenge faced by QA teams and developers alike is the accidental exposure of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) during testing phases. Without proper documentation or governance, this risk increases significantly.

As a Lead QA Engineer, I faced a situation where test data was leaking PII into log files, error reports, and even network traffic. The root problem wasn’t a lack of technology but a lack of structured code practices and clear documentation. To address this, I implemented a TypeScript-based approach to sanitize data dynamically, ensuring PII is never exposed during automated tests.

The Core Problem

The core issue is that test environments sometimes use real user data, which might get logged, transmitted, or displayed despite being meant for isolated testing. Typical symptoms include:

• Sensitive fields like email addresses, SSNs, or phone numbers appearing in logs.
• Error messages revealing user data.
• Network requests or responses containing PII.

Addressing this requires a multi-layered approach: data masking, strict type enforcement, and runtime sanitization.

Designing the Solution

While the code lacked proper documentation, I focused on creating a TypeScript utility library that automatically detects and masks PII in objects, logs, and API payloads. The goal was to embed this directly into the data flow, reducing human error.

Step 1: Defining PII Fields

The first step is to identify common fields that typically contain PII:

const PII_FIELDS = ['email', 'ssn', 'phone', 'address', 'name'];

Step 2: Creating a Generic Masking Function

Using this, I designed a recursive function that traverses objects and replaces values of PII fields with masked version.

function maskPIIData(obj: any): any {
  if (Array.isArray(obj)) {
    return obj.map(maskPIIData);
  }
  if (typeof obj === 'object' && obj !== null) {
    const maskedObj: any = {};
    Object.keys(obj).forEach((key) => {
      if (PII_FIELDS.includes(key.toLowerCase())) {
        maskedObj[key] = '***MASKED***';
      } else {
        maskedObj[key] = maskPIIData(obj[key]);
      }
    });
    return maskedObj;
  }
  return obj;
}

Step 3: Integrating into Logs and API Calls

Once the masking function is established, I integrated it into logging and API response handlers:

// Logging example
function logData(data: any) {
  const sanitizedData = maskPIIData(data);
  console.log(JSON.stringify(sanitizedData, null, 2));
}

// API response handling
async function handleApiResponse(response: Response) {
  const data = await response.json();
  const sanitizedData = maskPIIData(data);
  // Log or process sanitized data
  logData(sanitizedData);
}

Step 4: Automating and Enforcing Usage

To ensure consistent application, I created ESLint rules and TypeScript types that discourage passing raw PII data without masking.

Results and Lessons Learned

This approach drastically reduced accidental PII leaks during testing phases. It also provided a reusable namespace to guide team members toward safer data handling practices.

Key takeaways:

• Automate data sanitization as close to the source as possible.
• Use type-safe, recursive functions for flexible data structures.
• Embed security namespaces within your data flow to ensure compliance.

By implementing these strategies solely with TypeScript, we achieved a sustainable, scalable solution that required no extensive documentation or manual intervention. While code quality and documentation are essential, adopting robust runtime data handling and type enforcement can prevent leaks before they occur, saving costs and protecting user privacy.

Ensuring test environments are secure isn’t just best practice; it’s a necessity in today’s privacy-conscious landscape. The combination of strict typing, automation, and thoughtful design makes it feasible to eliminate PII leaks effectively.

---

🛠️ QA Tip

I rely on TempoMail USA to keep my test environments clean.