DEV Community

Cover image for Sanity vs Payload CMS vs Prismic: Pricing Comparison 2026
Nayan Kyada
Nayan Kyada

Posted on Edited on Originally published at nayankyada.com

Sanity vs Payload CMS vs Prismic: Pricing Comparison 2026

Sanity, Payload CMS, and Prismic are three of the most searched headless CMS options for Next.js teams in 2026, and their pricing models are structured so differently that a direct comparison is harder than it looks. This post cuts through the marketing pages and maps out what each platform actually costs at three realistic scales: a solo side project, a small product team, and an agency running multiple client sites.

Why these three are hard to compare directly

Payload is self-hosted open source by default — no per-seat fee, no usage meter, but you're paying for compute and Postgres somewhere. Sanity is a managed API service with a generous free tier and a Growth plan that charges per seat plus usage overages. Prismic is SaaS priced as a flat fee per repository, with each tier capping the number of users and locales. They're solving the same problem in three different commercial structures, which makes apples-to-apples pricing non-trivial.

Sanity pricing in 2026

Sanity's Free plan gives each project up to 20 seats, 1M API CDN requests and 250k API requests per month, 100 GB bandwidth, 100 GB of assets, and two datasets — public only. There are no overages on Free: you stay within the quotas or upgrade. It covers most portfolio sites and small blogs indefinitely.

The Growth plan is $15 per seat per month (up to 50 seats; viewer-only users are free). Because Free already covers 20 seats, the usual upgrade triggers are needing a private dataset, going past the free quotas, or wanting Growth features. Growth includes the same base quotas, then charges overages — $1 per extra 250k API CDN requests, $1 per extra 25k API requests, and $0.30 per GB of bandwidth — or you can buy an increased-quota add-on.

Enterprise pricing is custom and quote-only; it's the tier for SSO, audit requirements, and contractual support SLAs.

Payload CMS pricing in 2026

Payload's open-source version is free forever and has no seat restrictions. You run it on your own infrastructure — a $10–20/month Fly.io or Railway instance plus a Postgres database gets you production-ready. The only real cost is your time to maintain it.

Payload Cloud, the managed offering, has paused deployment of new projects (per Payload's cloud pricing page at the time of writing), so for a new build the realistic path is self-hosting — on a VPS, Railway, Fly.io, or Vercel with a managed Postgres.

Self-hosting Payload at scale is predictable cost-wise: you're paying cloud infrastructure rates, with no per-seat or per-site licence fee. For agencies running 10+ client sites, self-hosted Payload on a shared VPS cluster is frequently the cheapest option across all three.

Prismic pricing in 2026

Prismic charges a flat monthly fee per repository (shown billed annually), not per seat — and every plan includes unlimited documents. What changes between tiers is the number of users and locales. The Free plan allows 1 user and 2 locales. Starter is $10/month for 3 users and 3 locales, Small is $25/month for 7 users and 4 locales, Medium is $150/month for 25 users, and Platinum is $675/month with unlimited users.

Bandwidth and API limits are published: the lower tiers include 4 million API calls and 100 GB of CDN bandwidth a month, with bandwidth overages at $0.30/GB on paid plans. Check prismic.io/pricing for current numbers before you commit.

Side-by-side cost table

Scenario Sanity Payload CMS Prismic
Solo project / portfolio Free forever Free (self-host ~$10/mo infra) Free (1 user)
3 editors, 1 site Free tier Free + ~$15/mo infra $10/mo (Starter, 3 users)
5 editors, 1 site Free tier, or $75/mo on Growth (5 seats) if you need private datasets or overages Free + ~$20/mo infra $25/mo (Small, up to 7 users)
5 editors, 5 client sites Free per project, or ~$75/mo per project on Growth Self-host ~$30–50/mo shared ~$125/mo (5 repositories on Small)
Enterprise (20+ editors) Custom Self-host at scale Medium/Platinum or custom

Payload's self-hosted model wins on pure cost at nearly every scale. Sanity wins on zero-ops convenience and GROQ query flexibility. Prismic's flat per-repository pricing is cheap for small teams, but the user and locale caps per tier are the upgrade triggers to plan for.

What actually triggers an upgrade

Sanity — with 20 seats on Free, the trigger is rarely seat count. It's usually needing a private dataset (Free datasets are public-only), going past the free API or bandwidth quotas, or needing Growth-tier features. Bandwidth overages are rare for small marketing sites.

Payload — on the open-source path, the trigger is ops overhead: backups, migrations, Postgres maintenance. When a client starts asking about uptime SLAs, you productionise your own infra more seriously — managed Postgres, backups, monitoring.

Prismic — user and locale counts are the triggers. A fourth editor moves you from Starter to Small; a fourth or fifth language pushes you up a tier too. And because pricing is per repository, costs scale linearly once you're running sites for multiple clients.

Which makes sense at which scale

For a solo Next.js developer building client sites, Sanity Free or a self-hosted Payload instance covers 80% of projects with minimal cost. Prismic's free tier (one user) is too restrictive for most real client work, though its paid tiers start low.

For a three-to-five person product team that wants a managed API and doesn't want to think about infrastructure, Sanity Growth is the cleanest path. Even at $75/month for five Growth seats the cost is predictable, and the GROQ + Sanity Studio combination has the best developer experience of the three.

For an agency running ten or more independent client sites, self-hosted Payload on a shared cluster is typically the cheapest option by a wide margin. The open-source license has no per-site fee, and a well-configured Railway or Fly.io setup costs far less per month than ten separate paid repositories on any per-site SaaS plan.

For teams that need Slice Machine and a visual page builder that non-technical editors can own completely, Prismic is still the most polished option — just budget for the user and locale caps on each tier before you hit them in production.

Top comments (0)