As you walk into any manufacturing plant in India, you come across the same statement in different words – our building, our floor space, our design, our budget is not ready for factory automation yet. The article is aimed at factory managers and manufacturing industry leaders who manage older factories and secretly believe that factory automation is for other people’s new factories. There may have been some truth to these assumptions about ten years ago. Many are no longer accurate today. These are the five myths worth reviewing before you decide to wait another year.
Assumption 1: "Automation needs a purpose-built facility"
Previous automation did rely on infrastructure: guidance tapes, cables, and conveyor belts. AMRs use a different approach. They construct a map of the facility, perform SLAM and LiDAR localization, and re-calculate routes whenever an obstacle appears on their way. No need for redesigning of the whole building to integrate AMRs.
It does not mean all plants are immediately prepared. It means the initial question changes from "are we able to redesign?" to "which flows can we automate?"
Assumption 2: "Our floor is too uneven"
It is normal to have cracked joints, patched floors, and expansion joints in plants operating for years. Most of the robots work in warehouses having smooth floors, and rightly so.
However, in this case, NexStride’s Travo 500, an automatic material handling robot carrying up to 500 kg, is meant for internal logistics on rough industrial flooring. However, this must not be taken as granted in either case; the floor condition needs to be checked. Site survey involves walking the actual paths and marking out the problem areas.
Assumption 3: "Automation means a big, risky capital commitment"
For most owners, however, the issue is not about technology but about cash flow and risk. There are two factors that can address this issue.
The first one is the scope of the project. The use of a single AMR system to replace human operators on a specific route is quite different from transforming the entire facility. The second factor is the financing model of using Robots as a Service (RaaS).
Assumption 4: "Our systems are too fragmented to connect"
Many older facilities use both ERP, spreadsheets and paper systems. However, it doesn’t mean that there is no room for automation. There are certain constraints that determine the order of the process.
A fleet management layer, such as NXS FleetManager, works via API interfaces of existing ERP and WMS systems, thus making robots perform their actions on the basis of production or inventory data. In case of insufficient automation, most plants start with request-based paths and improve them later, while the goal is to automate only one particular path.
Assumption 5: "Our people will resist it"
Honesty should prevail in this case. Resistance is true when the implementation of automation comes as a surprise to people. The resistance decreases when people participate in the decision-making process regarding the initial route, know the safety regulations and realize that automation has taken over the unpleasant part of the work such as transporting loaded trolleys. Stop-and-Pick workflow, when the robot stops at a certain station in order for an operator to load/unload the cargo and then proceeds, keeps people involved.
A Composite Scenario
Illustrative only, not a real client.
Imagine a manufacturing and assembly facility of moderate size with the old building and the newer annex. Components move back and forth along a manually pulled cart through an entrance where an expansion joint can be seen. The owner thinks the path is not fit for automated vehicles. However, the survey reveals two trouble spots and one tight turn only. The facility decides to go for the annex to assembly path as a pilot project.
What Still Needs Judgement
Every legacy vehicle is not appropriate for all routes. Some routes, such as narrow routes, pedestrian traffic without defined routes, and congested routes, might not be suitable at all. In some cases, there will still be manual vehicles and it is perfectly okay. A genuine partner in automation will advise which routes to avoid.
What an Owner Should Ask Any Vendor
Have you assessed my actual floor and routes, or only a brochure scenario?
How does your software connect to my existing systems?
What does phase one include, and what is deliberately excluded?
What happens when a route needs to change?
Key Takeaways
Brownfield plants are not automatically excluded from factory automation.
A site assessment, not an assumption, should decide feasibility.
Start with one contained flow, then expand.
Integration can grow in stages alongside the pilot.
Involve operators early. It shapes adoption more than any feature.
Start the Conversation With NexStride Robotics
If you run an established plant and want an honest view of what can be automated today, NexStride Robotics can assess your facility and recommend a realistic first step.
Website: nexstriderobotics.com
Email: sales@nexstriderobotics.com
Phone: +91 9611818492
FAQs
- Can older factories adopt AMRs? Often yes, subject to a site assessment of floors, aisles and routes.
- Do we need to replace our ERP first? No. Integration can begin with the flow you are automating and deepen over time.
- Is RaaS available for a pilot? NexStride offers RaaS as an option. Terms are agreed per project.
- What if parts of the plant are unsuitable? Those areas can stay manual while suitable routes are automated.
- Will operators lose their jobs? Robots take over repetitive transport work so people can focus on higher-value tasks.
Top comments (0)