APIs are the lifeblood of modern software.
They connect your frontend to your backend, your app to another app, and sometimes even one machine to another โ all without you even noticing.
But hereโs the thing:
Not all APIs are created equal.
Each has its own purpose, personality, and superpower.
So letโs dive deep (with some real-world examples) into the 7 API types that rule the tech world today ๐
๐ 1. REST API โ The All-Rounder
REST (Representational State Transfer) is the go-to for most developers. Itโs stateless, lightweight, and uses simple HTTP methods like GET , POST , PUT , and DELETE.
๐น Format: JSON
๐น Use cases: Web apps, mobile apps, IoT devices
๐น Famous for: Simplicity & scalability
๐ก Example:
GET https://api.twitter.com/2/tweets
โ Pros:
Easy to build and test
Platform-independent
Scales beautifully
โ ๏ธ Cons:
No strict contracts
Not ideal for real-time or highly reliable systems
๐ Best for: Most modern web/mobile development
๐งฑ 2. SOAP API โ The Old but Reliable Workhorse
SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) is the veteran in the API world. Itโs strict, structured, and super reliable.
๐น Format: XML
๐น Protocols: HTTP, HTTPS, SMTP, TCP
๐น Use cases: Banking, healthcare, government
๐ก Example (SOAP Envelope):
<soap:Envelope>
<soap:Body>
<GetUserInfo>...</GetUserInfo>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
โ Pros:
Built-in error handling
Supports security and transactions
Works across multiple transport layers
โ ๏ธ Cons:
Verbose and heavy (XML ๐ฉ)
Slower than REST
๐ Best for: Mission-critical systems needing guaranteed delivery
โก 3. gRPC โ The Speed Demon
gRPC, built by Google, takes performance to another level.
It uses Protocol Buffers (protobuf) for data serialization and HTTP/2 under the hood โ meaning itโs blazing fast โก.
๐น Communication styles: Request-response, streaming, bidirectional
๐น Use cases: High-frequency systems (e.g. trading, video services)
๐ก Example (Service definition):
service Greeter {
rpc SayHello (HelloRequest) returns (HelloReply);
}
โ Pros:
Extremely fast
Supports streaming both ways
Great for microservices
โ ๏ธ Cons:
Harder to set up
Not browser-native
๐ Best for: Backend-to-backend communication and high-performance systems
Other ones are covered in PART-2



Top comments (1)
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.