I am working on a new post slowly. And I always feel like something that I write might not be clear enough or fail to address important questions. ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
A peer reviewed article network isn't a bad idea. But many of the discussions that are happening here aren't really scholarly in nature. Maybe what you are asking for can be built into the arrangement algorithm to provide some incentive to be peer reviewed.
What do you think about that?
Yes, 100% agree. Haven't really had the inspiration on how that would fit the product yet.
Suggestions on how it would work, or even the basic MVP, are welcome.
The simplest thing I can imagine is an option to opt-in to review articles before publishing in your profile. Then a post author can ask reviewers to review the draft. Reviewers can accept or ignore the invite, and if they accept (max three can accept), they can read and comment the draft. Once published, the draft comments are removed.