I am a developer with a passion for testing. I've been coding for 14 years and I want to share my experience and learnings with other developers to help them write better software.
I would say my library has a simpler and more eloquent interface. Also the code in my library is more abstracted so should be more robustly tested.
A weakness would be that ReallySimpleJWT hasn't been as widely used therefore in terms of community feedback and integration testing it's probably not as robust.
I would though very much appreciate any feedback you have on my code, feel free to open some issues if you think it necessary.
Cheers, Rob
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Hi Rob,
Great work! Looks easy to use. However, what's the advantage of your library over something like firebase/php-jwt?
Hi, thanks for the response.
I would say my library has a simpler and more eloquent interface. Also the code in my library is more abstracted so should be more robustly tested.
A weakness would be that ReallySimpleJWT hasn't been as widely used therefore in terms of community feedback and integration testing it's probably not as robust.
I would though very much appreciate any feedback you have on my code, feel free to open some issues if you think it necessary.
Cheers, Rob