I'm a software developer, currently I'm working with front end technologies, like ReactJs and Angular, also I'm very interested in Rust and NodeJS.
Follow me on GitHub https://github.com/Jucian0
I'm a software developer, currently I'm working with front end technologies, like ReactJs and Angular, also I'm very interested in Rust and NodeJS.
Follow me on GitHub https://github.com/Jucian0
I'm a software developer, currently I'm working with front end technologies, like ReactJs and Angular, also I'm very interested in Rust and NodeJS.
Follow me on GitHub https://github.com/Jucian0
Okay, my opinion is based in old versions of NgRx, but it's strange that we have a function as a reducer in Angular, but with ngxs we hava a class with decorators.
This approach make more sense for me when we are using Angular.
It's like a foreign body.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I think you meant to say NgRx not RXJS.
NgRx is the implementation of the redux pattern for angular using rxjs.
RXjs is the JS implementation of reactive extensions which itself is an implementation of the observable pattern amongst other things.
NgRx has the stores, actions, etc
Rxjs does not have those concepts.
Yeah, I was confused about RXJS and NGXS and NgRx, thanks
Oh I hadn’t even heard of ngxs!
When we think how Angular works, IMO NGXS makes more sense than NgRx
Interesting, why do you think that?
Okay, my opinion is based in old versions of NgRx, but it's strange that we have a function as a reducer in Angular, but with ngxs we hava a class with decorators.
This approach make more sense for me when we are using Angular.
It's like a foreign body.