DEV Community

Cover image for Python vs Golang vs Rust
Soumendra Kumar Sahoo
Soumendra Kumar Sahoo

Posted on

2 3

Python vs Golang vs Rust

Test scenario

I have taken the Two sum problem from Leetcode.

The problem statement:

Given an array of integers nums and an integer target, return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to target.

You may assume that each input would have exactly one solution, and you may not use the same element twice.

You can return the answer in any order.

Example 1:

Input: nums = [2,7,11,15], target = 9
Output: [0,1]
Explanation: Because nums[0] + nums[1] == 9, we return [0, 1].

Example 2:

Input: nums = [3,2,4], target = 6
Output: [1,2]

Example 3:

Input: nums = [3,3], target = 6
Output: [0,1]

Constraints:

2 <= nums.length <= 104
-109 <= nums[i] <= 109
-109 <= target <= 109
Only one valid answer exists.

Implementation

I have used a hash map to solve this problem across all three languages.

Python

class Solution:
    def twoSum(self, nums: List[int], target: int) -> List[int]:
        hash_table = {}
        for i, num in enumerate(nums):
            target_num = target - num
            if num in hash_table:
                return i, hash_table[num]
            else:
                hash_table[target_num] = i
        return None
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Python stats

  • Run time: 40ms
  • Memory usage: 14.5 MB

Golang

func twoSum(nums []int, target int) []int {
    hashMap := make(map[int] int)
    for i := 0; i < len(nums); i++{
        if _, found := hashMap[nums[i]]; found {
            ans := []int{i, hashMap[nums[i]]}
            return ans
        } else {
            hashMap[target- nums[i]]= i
        }
    }
    return nil
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Golang stats

  • Run time: 4ms
  • Memory usage: 4.3 MB

Rust

use std::collections::HashMap;
impl Solution {
    pub fn two_sum(nums: Vec<i32>, target: i32) -> Vec<i32> {
        let mut hash_table: HashMap<i32, i32> = HashMap::new();
    for i in 0..nums.len() {
        // println!("Processing number: {}", nums[i]);
        match hash_table.get(&nums[i]){
            Some(&x) => return vec![x, i as i32],
            None => hash_table.insert(target - nums[i], i as i32),
        };
    };
    return vec![-1, -1]
    }
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Rust stats

  • Run time: 2ms
  • Memory usage: 2.2 MB

Conclusion

  • As per the results, Rust took the least memory and was the fastest of all three.

For more such insights follow me on Twitter.
Original post: Hashnode

Image of Quadratic

AI, code, and data connections in a familiar spreadsheet UI

Simplify data analysis by connecting directly to your database or API, writing code, and using the latest LLMs.

Try Quadratic free

Top comments (3)

Collapse
 
chayimfriedman2 profile image
Chayim Friedman

Rust's default hashing algorithm is slow; using an algorithm like fx hash or aHash is likely to give you better results.

Collapse
 
soumendrak profile image
Soumendra Kumar Sahoo

I tested the slower one 😱 Thank you. Will try those out.

Collapse
 
der_gopher profile image
Alex Pliutau

We'll be soon publishing an article about comparing Rust and Go in 2024, stay tuned here - packagemain.tech/

Neon image

Set up a Neon project in seconds and connect from a Python application

If you're starting a new project, Neon has got your databases covered. No credit cards. No trials. No getting in your way.

Get started →

👋 Kindness is contagious

If this article connected with you, consider tapping ❤️ or leaving a brief comment to share your thoughts!

Okay