Unachievable dreams?
I am sure sometimes you lean back and wonder how we got to the status quo regarding the stacks we use. I mean, does...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Hooks are great, but for me they don't come close to replacing redux. Redux is designed to make it easier to manage state. Some people don't like to manage state this way, and so hooks are great for them - but for those of us that do like redux as a state container, hooks aren't that.
well then.., what thoughts do U have about usability 4 'state' within stateLESS env like API?
I'm not sure I understand the question - you're asking how state can be used in a stateless environment? I would imagine very little?
Redux does have a state && I'm not sure U do understand, do U?
I think that you guys have the issue that one is talking about the backend state (and then referring to stateless sessionless), and the other about the client side state.
There is no more backend && frontend 4 JS when single-4-all Node'd come 2 place || what do U MEAN by that?
D.R.Y fool anymore. but raise 2 full up D.I.Y stack.
Can you rephrase that? I read this comment multiple times without getting closer to its meaning.
{D.R.Y: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repe...} fool anymore. but raise {2: to} {full up: en.wiktionary.org/wiki/full_up} {D.I.Y: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_it_yourself} stack
Lol. Let me rephrase then: the acronyms in your comment aren't the issue: I don't know what you are trying to say with your comment.
Well, if acronyms is OK, then let me make a single friendly farewel K.I.S.S. As far as PHP @ backend is just a Preprocessor 4…, with advance of Node right time'd come 2 teach JS 2 do $IT @ backend but up 2 frontend
I give you that: I don't know if I am facing a language barrier, bot or troll