Discussion went to abstract realm. I'm not sure I understand what you trying to say.
Classical example of "choosing DX over UX" is CSS-in-JS. It provides much better DX, than plain CSS, but worse UX, because any CSS-in-JS (with runtime) is slower than plain CSS.
And stop choosing DX over UX in this case would be to use CSS-in-JS without runtime, like vanilla-extract.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Discussion went to abstract realm. I'm not sure I understand what you trying to say.
Classical example of "choosing DX over UX" is CSS-in-JS. It provides much better DX, than plain CSS, but worse UX, because any CSS-in-JS (with runtime) is slower than plain CSS.
And stop choosing DX over UX in this case would be to use CSS-in-JS without runtime, like vanilla-extract.