DEV Community

teaganga
teaganga

Posted on

Bicep / ARM vs Terraform

Bicep and ARM templates are Terraform alternatives, but only within the Azure ecosystem.

Bicep / ARM vs Terraform — What’s the difference?

Bicep

  • Azure-specific DSL for IaC.
  • Compiles into ARM templates.
  • First-class support by Microsoft.
  • Best choice if you're 100% Azure and want:

    • Tight integration with Azure
    • Fast updates when new Azure features come out
    • Simple syntax compared to ARM JSON

ARM Templates

  • Low-level JSON IaC for Azure.
  • Verbose & harder to maintain.
  • Bicep is meant to replace writing ARM JSON manually.

Terraform

  • Cloud-agnostic IaC tool.
  • Works with Azure, AWS, GCP, VMware, Kubernetes, etc.
  • Uses HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language).
  • Great for:

    • Multi-cloud environments
    • Advanced orchestration
    • Rich ecosystem of providers & modules

🔍 So is Bicep an alternative to Terraform?

Yes, but only if your infrastructure is Azure-only.

  • If you're Azure-only → Bicep is a strong alternative, simpler and more native.
  • If you're multi-cloud → Terraform is the better choice.

📊 Quick Comparison

Feature Bicep ARM Templates Terraform
Cloud support Azure only Azure only Multi-cloud
Language Simple DSL JSON HCL
Native Azure support Excellent Excellent Very good (slightly slower updates)
Learning curve Low High Moderate
State management Azure handles state Azure handles state Terraform state backend (S3, Azure blob, etc.)
Modularity Good Limited Excellent
Multi-cloud workflows

🧭 When to choose which?

Choose Bicep if:

  • You work primarily in Azure.
  • You want clean, readable IaC.
  • You want the newest Azure features immediately.

Choose Terraform if:

  • You operate across multiple clouds.
  • You want very strong modules and ecosystem support.
  • You need complex workflows, reusable patterns, and a mature toolchain.

More about Bicep and ARM

Bicep and ARM templates are both ways to define Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for deploying Azure resources.

  • ARM templates = JSON-based, older, more verbose.
  • Bicep = Newer, simpler, domain-specific language that compiles into ARM JSON.

🧱 ARM Templates (Azure Resource Manager Templates)

ARM templates are JSON files that describe Azure resources you want to deploy.
They are:

  • JSON-based (structured but verbose)
  • Deterministic (same template = same deployment result)
  • Supported everywhere in Azure

Example snippet (ARM JSON):

{
  "type": "Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts",
  "apiVersion": "2023-01-01",
  "name": "mystorage",
  "location": "eastus",
  "sku": { "name": "Standard_LRS" },
  "kind": "StorageV2"
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Problems:

  • Hard to read and write
  • Lots of nested syntax
  • Painful for complex deployments

🟦 Bicep (Next-Gen IaC for Azure)

Bicep is a domain-specific language (DSL) from Microsoft made to replace ARM templates.

Key traits:

  • Much more concise & readable
  • Strong type checking & IntelliSense in VS Code
  • Modular & reusable
  • Converts to ARM JSON under the hood (so same engine, better language)

Example snippet (Bicep):

resource storage 'Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts@2023-01-01' = {
  name: 'mystorage'
  location: 'eastus'
  sku: {
    name: 'Standard_LRS'
  }
  kind: 'StorageV2'
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Benefits:

  • 60–80% fewer lines than ARM
  • Easier learning curve
  • Better tooling (VS Code extension)

🔁 Relationship Between Them

  • Bicep → compiles to → ARM JSON
  • ARM engine → executes the deployment
  • Anything ARM can do, Bicep can do (because it uses the same backend)

You can:

  • Convert existing ARM templates → Bicep (bicep decompile)
  • Convert Bicep → ARM JSON (bicep build)

🥇 Which should you use today?

Bicep is the recommended IaC language for Azure
ARM templates still work, but Bicep is easier and more productive.

Top comments (0)