Bicep and ARM templates are Terraform alternatives, but only within the Azure ecosystem.
Bicep / ARM vs Terraform — What’s the difference?
Bicep
- Azure-specific DSL for IaC.
- Compiles into ARM templates.
- First-class support by Microsoft.
-
Best choice if you're 100% Azure and want:
- Tight integration with Azure
- Fast updates when new Azure features come out
- Simple syntax compared to ARM JSON
ARM Templates
- Low-level JSON IaC for Azure.
- Verbose & harder to maintain.
- Bicep is meant to replace writing ARM JSON manually.
Terraform
- Cloud-agnostic IaC tool.
- Works with Azure, AWS, GCP, VMware, Kubernetes, etc.
- Uses HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language).
-
Great for:
- Multi-cloud environments
- Advanced orchestration
- Rich ecosystem of providers & modules
🔍 So is Bicep an alternative to Terraform?
Yes, but only if your infrastructure is Azure-only.
- If you're Azure-only → Bicep is a strong alternative, simpler and more native.
- If you're multi-cloud → Terraform is the better choice.
📊 Quick Comparison
| Feature | Bicep | ARM Templates | Terraform |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud support | Azure only | Azure only | Multi-cloud |
| Language | Simple DSL | JSON | HCL |
| Native Azure support | Excellent | Excellent | Very good (slightly slower updates) |
| Learning curve | Low | High | Moderate |
| State management | Azure handles state | Azure handles state | Terraform state backend (S3, Azure blob, etc.) |
| Modularity | Good | Limited | Excellent |
| Multi-cloud workflows | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
🧭 When to choose which?
Choose Bicep if:
- You work primarily in Azure.
- You want clean, readable IaC.
- You want the newest Azure features immediately.
Choose Terraform if:
- You operate across multiple clouds.
- You want very strong modules and ecosystem support.
- You need complex workflows, reusable patterns, and a mature toolchain.
More about Bicep and ARM
Bicep and ARM templates are both ways to define Infrastructure as Code (IaC) for deploying Azure resources.
- ARM templates = JSON-based, older, more verbose.
- Bicep = Newer, simpler, domain-specific language that compiles into ARM JSON.
🧱 ARM Templates (Azure Resource Manager Templates)
ARM templates are JSON files that describe Azure resources you want to deploy.
They are:
- JSON-based (structured but verbose)
- Deterministic (same template = same deployment result)
- Supported everywhere in Azure
Example snippet (ARM JSON):
{
"type": "Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts",
"apiVersion": "2023-01-01",
"name": "mystorage",
"location": "eastus",
"sku": { "name": "Standard_LRS" },
"kind": "StorageV2"
}
Problems:
- Hard to read and write
- Lots of nested syntax
- Painful for complex deployments
🟦 Bicep (Next-Gen IaC for Azure)
Bicep is a domain-specific language (DSL) from Microsoft made to replace ARM templates.
Key traits:
- Much more concise & readable
- Strong type checking & IntelliSense in VS Code
- Modular & reusable
- Converts to ARM JSON under the hood (so same engine, better language)
Example snippet (Bicep):
resource storage 'Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts@2023-01-01' = {
name: 'mystorage'
location: 'eastus'
sku: {
name: 'Standard_LRS'
}
kind: 'StorageV2'
}
Benefits:
- 60–80% fewer lines than ARM
- Easier learning curve
- Better tooling (VS Code extension)
🔁 Relationship Between Them
- Bicep → compiles to → ARM JSON
- ARM engine → executes the deployment
- Anything ARM can do, Bicep can do (because it uses the same backend)
You can:
- Convert existing ARM templates → Bicep (
bicep decompile) - Convert Bicep → ARM JSON (
bicep build)
🥇 Which should you use today?
Bicep is the recommended IaC language for Azure
ARM templates still work, but Bicep is easier and more productive.
Top comments (0)