DEV Community

Cover image for JavaScript wasn't supposed to last this long. Then the internet happened.
Zakria Khan
Zakria Khan

Posted on

JavaScript wasn't supposed to last this long. Then the internet happened.

Brendan Eich created JavaScript in 10 days at Netscape in 1995. It was meant to be a simple scripting language for adding basic interactivity to web pages, form validation, image rollovers, simple animations.

Nobody expected it would eventually power:

  • Backend servers (Node.js)
  • Mobile applications (React Native)
  • Desktop applications (Electron)
  • Machine learning frameworks (TensorFlow.js)
  • Blockchain platforms (Ethereum)
  • Game engines (Phaser, Three.js)

JavaScript survived and thrived because of an accident of history: it was the only language browsers could execute. When the web became the dominant application platform, JavaScript became the only universal programming language by default.

This created a unique evolutionary pressure:
Unlike other languages designed by computer scientists with theoretical foundations, JavaScript evolved through practical necessity. Every weird quirk, every inconsistency, every design flaw became permanent because breaking backward compatibility would break the entire web.

The result: a language with beautiful parts and terrible parts, held together by decades of patches, workarounds, and community-developed conventions.

The best technology doesn't always win. The most accessible technology wins. JavaScript won because it had zero barriers to entry, anyone with a browser could start coding immediately.

Distribution beats perfection. JavaScript was embedded in every browser. Python might be more elegant, but it required installation. Java might be more structured, but it required compilation. JavaScript just worked, everywhere, immediately.

The technologies that succeed aren't the most elegant, they're the most accessible at the right moment.

JavaScript's dominance is an accident that became permanent because the web became permanent. Understanding this history explains why we're still patching a language designed in 10 days instead of replacing it with something better.

The best time to replace JavaScript was 1998. The second-best time is never, it's too embedded in global infrastructure to replace now.

Top comments (0)