The first time I used Copilot, it felt like magic. And then, almost immediately after, it felt like a betrayal.
It completed a function I was writing—a tedious, boilerplate data transformer—before I could even type the closing bracket. The code was… fine. It was correct. It was utterly soulless. It was the code equivalent of a mass-produced, flat-pack bookshelf: it holds books, but you’d never point to it and say, “Look at what I made.”
This, I realized, is not the end of our craft. This is the return of the forge.
We’ve been here before, you and I. We’ve lived through the journeys that reshaped our landscape.
- The Journey to Garbage Collection: We moved from meticulously managing every byte to trusting a runtime to do it for us. We didn't stop being developers; we started building more complex, robust applications.
- The Journey to Open Source: We stopped writing every single library from scratch. We stopped being solitary coders and became curators, composers, and contributors to a global tapestry of code.
- ** Journey to the Cloud:** We stopped worrying about physical hardware. Our canvas expanded from a single server to a limitless, distributed constellation of services.
Each of these was a paradigm shift that promised to "replace" us. Instead, they merely automated the tedious, freeing us to focus on the profound. They didn't reduce the number of developers; they exploded it, creating specializations we hadn't even dreamed of.
AI is not a different kind of journey. It is the next leg of the same, eternal expedition. It is our newest, most powerful tool. But a tool is only as good as the artisan who wields it.
The Incoming Deluge of "Worse Code"
Let's not be naive. The warning in the title is real. The signal-to-noise ratio of the codebase of the future is about to get much, much worse.
AI is a probabilistic mirror. It reflects the mean, the median, the most common. It trawls the vast, sprawling public corpus of code—a corpus filled with our compromises, our hacks, our "temporary" solutions that became permanent—and synthesizes it. It is the ultimate cargo cult programmer.
It will generate:
- Code that works, but doesn't know why. It will stitch together patterns it has seen, without understanding the underlying invariants.
- Solutions that are adequate, but not elegant. It will give you a hammer for every problem, even if a screwdriver is sitting right there.
- A false sense of completion. The hardest part of programming isn't writing code; it's reading, understanding, debugging, and maintaining it. AI excels at the first and fails miserably at the rest.
This is where our role transforms. We are no longer just writers of code. We are becoming Editors-in-Chief, Architects, and Curators.
The Artisan's New Tools: Beyond the Syntax
Our value will no longer be measured in lines of code per day. It will be measured in wisdom, discernment, and vision. Our artistry will shift.
1. The Art of the Prompt (The Brief)
We will learn to craft prompts not as commands, but as exquisite creative briefs. Instead of //write a function to sort users, we will learn to write:
//Write a function to sort users by lastActive date, descending, for our EU region, adhering to GDPR rules by excluding anonymized users, and optimize for read-heavy load with a possibility of pagination. Use the patterns established in our userService module.
This is not a menial task. This is a high-level act of design and specification. It requires deep system knowledge, foresight, and an understanding of constraints. This is our job now.
2. The Art of Critique (The Review)
Code review will become our most critical ceremony. It will no longer be about catching missing semicolons. It will be a masterclass in critique:
- "This algorithm works, but let's discuss its time complexity under load."
- "This code handles the happy path, but what are the edge cases the AI missed?"
- "This solution is coupled to a library we're trying to phase out. Let's use this as a teachable moment to refactor towards our new pattern."
We won't just be reviewing code; we'll be reviewing the AI's thought process and teaching our juniors how to do the same.
3. The Art of Architecture (The Vision)
AI is terrible at architecture. It cannot see the symphony, only the notes. It can't conceptualize the sprawling, interconnected beauty of a well-designed system bounded context, event-driven flow, and graceful degradation.
This is our uncharted territory. While the AI generates the bricks, we will be the architects designing the cathedral. We will spend more time on the whiteboard, defining boundaries, contracts, and flows, and less time translating those perfect ideas into imperfect syntax.
4. The Art of Teaching (The Legacy)
The most important code we write will be the examples we set, the patterns we document, and the wisdom we impart to the next generation—both human and model. By writing exquisite code ourselves and rigorously curating the AI's output, we are actively training the next iteration of these tools on what good looks like. We are shaping the future median.
The Journey Ahead
So, let them have their code generators. Let the entry-level boilerplate be automated into oblivion. This doesn't diminish our craft; it elevates it.
It pushes us further up the stack, closer to the true, irreducible core of our profession: solving complex human problems with clarity, elegance, and maintainability.
We are not being replaced. We are being forced to remember what made us developers in the first place. It wasn't our ability to memorize syntax. It was our ability to think.
The forge is hot. The flame of AI is here. It is not a fire meant to consume us. It is a fire meant to temper us. Let us pick up this new hammer and build wonders they said were impossible.
Let's get to work.
Top comments (0)