Most re-encyclopedia write-ups stop at the README: here is what the tool does, here is how you run it. This one covers what it refuses to do, and where it breaks.
What it is
A SOTA reverse-engineering encyclopedia: 9 sections from C/asm/PE fundamentals to agentic MCP pipelines on Ghidra and IDA. All 97 links opened by hand, metadata pulled from the GitHub REST API for 59 repositories.
In Russian: Энциклопедия SOTA реверс-инжиниринга: 9 разделов от базы C/asm/PE до агентных MCP-пайплайнов на Ghidra и IDA. Все 97 ссылок открыты вручную, у 59 репозиториев сняты метаданные через GitHub REST API.
Install
запуск: python3 scripts/refresh_data.py --selfcheck # офлайн: data/ читается, схемы целы
Python. MIT licensed. Standard library first: the tool reads the data you point it at and sends nothing anywhere.
Where it does not fit
Every rule in a checker like this can produce a false positive. Use it to find candidates for a rewrite, not to grade a writer, and not where the voice is the point.
Repository
Source, issue tracker and documentation: https://gitlab.com/ameobius-ai/re-encyclopedia
Other tools from the same author: https://ameobius-ai.gitlab.io
Top comments (0)