## DEV Community π©βπ»π¨βπ» is a community of 966,904 amazing developers

We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.

Apoorv Tyagi

Posted on • Updated on • Originally published at apoorvtyagi.tech

# Introduction

A month ago, I got a chance to learn about the nullish coalescing operator in Javascript. So I decided to share that on my twitter and linkedIn.

And the response which was common on both the posts was this π

So I decided to write a detailed blog post explaining what's the difference between a Nullish Coalescing Operator (??) and a Logical OR (||)

But before proceeding further, let us remind ourselves with one very common concept in Javascript which is what are the truthy/falsy values.

# "Truthy" and "Falsy" Values

In JavaScript, there are 6 values which are considered to be falsy:

• undefined
• null
• NaN
• 0
• ""(empty string)
• false

All other JavaScript values will produce true and are thus considered truthy.

Here are few examples π

``````const value1 = 1;
const value2 = 23;

const result = value1 || value2;

console.log(result); // 1
``````
``````const value1 = 0;
const value2 = 23;

const result = value1 || value2;

console.log(result); // 23
``````

Here, because value1 is 0, value2 will be checked. As it's a truthy value, the result of the entire expression will be the value2.

#### TL;DR -

If any of those six values (false, undefined, null, empty string, NaN, 0) is the first operand of || , then weβll get the second operand as the result.

# Why "Nullish Coalescing Operator"?

The || operator works great but sometimes we only want the next expression to be evaluated when the first operand is only either null or undefined.

Therefore, ES11 has added the nullish coalescing operator.

The ?? operator can be used to provide a fallback value in case another value is null or undefined. It takes two operands and is written like this:

``````value ?? fallbackValue
``````

If the left operand is null or undefined, the ?? expression evaluates to the right operand:

### Combining the nullish coalescing operator with optional chaining operator

The optional chaining operator (?.) allows us to access a nested property without having explicit checks for each object in the chain of whether the object exists or not.

We can combine the nullish coalescing operator with the optional chaining operator, thereby safely provide a value other than undefined for a missing property. Hereβs an example:

``````const country = {
general: {
name: null
}
};
const region = country ?.general?.name?? "France";
console.log(region);    // France
``````

# Conclusion

We have seen the nullish coalescing operator is really useful when you only care about the null or undefined value for any variable.

And the meme just sums it all π

The whole point of Nullish Coalescing Operator is to distinguishes between nullish (null, undefined) and falsey but defined values (false, 0, '' etc.)

For || (logical OR) nullish and falsey values are the same.

# One last thing...

I recently started out my own * newsletter * where every Wednesday, I send out best tips from Latest tech to Software Engineering best practices and some writings related to cognitive biases and human psychology.

If you don't wanna miss out, consider subscribing.(It's FUN & 100% FREE)

### If you like what you read here and want to show support, consider buying me some coffee β

Sebastian

A long time ago I stumbled upon a bug in a JS dashboard-like visualization. A REST api was continuously queried for data in a given interval of `x` ms.

The parameter `x` was read from an XML file to make the dashboard configurable. The idea was to disable the querying if the parameter was set to 0, and to default to a given value (say 5000ms) in case the parameter was not set at all.

Interestingly, the end user was unable to disable the querying feature, even though they assigned a value of '0'.

Turns out the parameter was read as a string and defaulted with the logical `||` operator:

``````let intervalMs = parseInt(x) || 5000;
``````

Now guess why the user was unable to disable the querying!

Full disclosure: The dev responsible for this glitch was myself from ages ago. π€£

Apoorv Tyagi

Hahaha.

That adds to a good practical example where (??) would have been better. Thanks for adding that

Also as a dev, I am sure We all have been guilty of doing something like that in our early daysπ

## π€―

### "I made 10x faster JSON.stringify() functions, even type safe"

βοΈ Must read for JS devs