The Paradigm Shift in Web Development for AI-Era: From Client-Side to Server-Side Rendering

Original post: https://hankchiu.tw/writings/the-paradigm-shift-of-web-frameworks-in-ai-era-from-client-side-to-server-side-rendering/

The following article, written with AI assistance, explores this topic.
My initial ideas were:

• A brief history of the rise of Single-Page Applications (SPAs).
• Engineering challenges of client-side rendering for AI-native applications.
• How server-side rendering can address these challenges.
• Practical tools and libraries for further exploration.

Enjoy the read!

 

---

 

The web development landscape is experiencing a fundamental transformation. As artificial intelligence becomes deeply integrated into web applications, we're witnessing a significant shift away from the client-side rendering dominance that defined the 2010s.

The Rise and Reign of Single Page Applications

The SPA Revolution (2010-2020)

The Single Page Application era began with frameworks like Angular (2010), React (2013), and Vue.js (2014) promising desktop-like experiences in the browser. SPAs offered fluid user experiences with no page refreshes, rich interactivity, and clean separation between frontend and backend.

By the mid-2010s, client-side rendering became the default choice. Several factors drove this adoption:

• Improved JavaScript engines made client-side computation viable
• CDN proliferation made delivering JavaScript bundles cost-effective
• Mobile hardware improvements provided sufficient processing power
• Broadband adoption reduced concerns about initial load times

The result was a generation of developers who learned web development through React, Angular, and Vue. Client-side rendering became the cultural norm.

Engineering Challenges in the AI Era

Real-Time Processing Challenges

Modern AI applications demand capabilities that traditional SPAs struggle to deliver:

Network Overhead and Latency
AI applications require constant communication with servers for model updates, training data, or hybrid processing. This creates more network requests than traditional SPAs, ironically reducing the performance benefits that CSR was meant to provide. Real-time AI features like live translation, content generation, or computer vision processing suffer from network round-trip delays.

Synchronization Complexity
AI applications frequently need to maintain state consistency across multiple AI services (embeddings, completions, fine-tuned models). Managing this distributed state on the client introduces significant complexity and potential for data inconsistencies, especially when handling real-time collaborative AI features.

Processing Bottlenecks
Client devices, particularly mobile phones and budget laptops, lack the computational power for real-time AI processing. While servers can leverage specialized GPUs and TPUs, client-side AI inference creates noticeable delays and poor user experiences for time-sensitive applications.

Development and Maintenance Overhead

Fragmentation Across Devices
Different devices have varying AI capabilities (Neural Processing Units, GPU acceleration, WebGL support). Creating consistent AI experiences across this fragmented landscape requires substantial engineering effort. Developers must handle graceful degradation, feature detection, and multiple code paths for different device capabilities.

Version Management Complexity
AI models evolve rapidly with frequent updates and improvements. Managing model versions, backward compatibility, and deployment across diverse client devices becomes exponentially more complex than traditional web application updates. Each client potentially runs different model versions, creating support nightmares.

Resource Management
Client-side AI applications must carefully manage memory usage, processing threads, and battery consumption. This adds significant complexity to the development process, requiring specialized knowledge of device capabilities and performance optimization techniques that most web developers lack.

Server-Side Rendering: The AI-Era Solution

Why SSR Makes Sense for AI Applications

Server-side rendering addresses the fundamental misalignment between AI computational requirements and client device capabilities:

Specialized Hardware
Servers utilize GPUs, TPUs, and specialized AI hardware that provide orders of magnitude better performance than client devices for AI workloads.

Consistent Performance
Server-side AI processing provides predictable performance regardless of client device capabilities, ensuring all users receive the same high-quality experience.

Simplified Architecture
Centralized model deployment simplifies updates, A/B testing, and maintenance of AI capabilities while reducing client-side complexity.

Technical Benefits

• Reduced Initial Load Times: Users receive pre-rendered HTML with AI-generated content already in place
• Enhanced Security: AI models and processing remain on the server, preventing model extraction
• Better SEO and Accessibility: AI-generated content is immediately available to search engines and screen readers
• Resource Efficiency: Server infrastructure allows efficient resource sharing across users

Practical Tools for AI-Era SSR

Next.js: Server Actions and Streaming

Next.js leads the SSR renaissance with powerful AI features:

// Server Action for AI processing
'use server'
export async function generateResponse(formData) {
  const message = formData.get('message')
  const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
    model: "gpt-4",
    messages: [{ role: "user", content: message }]
  })
  return response.choices[0].message.content
}

Key Features:

• Server Actions for seamless AI processing
• Edge Runtime support for global distribution
• Built-in streaming for real-time AI responses

SvelteKit: Performance-First Approach

// Pre-process AI data before rendering
export async function load({ params }) {
  const userPreferences = await getUserPreferences(params.userId)
  const aiRecommendations = await generateRecommendations(userPreferences)

  return { recommendations: aiRecommendations }
}

Benefits:

• Minimal JavaScript footprint
• Server-side load functions for AI pre-processing
• Excellent performance characteristics

Specialized AI Tools

Vercel AI SDK

import { streamText } from 'ai'
import { openai } from '@ai-sdk/openai'

export async function POST(req) {
  const { messages } = await req.json()
  const result = await streamText({
    model: openai('gpt-4'),
    messages,
  })
  return result.toAIStreamResponse()
}

Infrastructure Options:

• Vercel Edge Functions: Global AI processing distribution
• Cloudflare Workers: Low-latency AI inference at the edge
• AWS Lambda: Serverless AI processing with AWS integration

Caching Strategies

• Redis: Cache AI responses and user sessions
• CDN Caching: Static AI-generated content with proper headers
• Edge Caching: Distribute AI-processed content globally

The Hybrid Future

The future involves sophisticated hybrid approaches:

Smart Rendering Decisions
Frameworks will automatically decide where to render based on content type, device capabilities, network conditions, and AI processing requirements.

Progressive AI Enhancement
Applications will layer AI capabilities progressively, ensuring core functionality works universally while enhancing experiences where possible.

Conclusion

The shift toward server-side rendering represents a maturation of web development practices in response to AI requirements. As AI becomes central to web applications, computational realities demand server-centric architectures.

This evolution incorporates lessons from the SPA era while addressing AI-native application challenges. The tools and frameworks are ready—the question is how quickly development teams will adapt to leverage AI-era server-side rendering benefits.

Comments

[david duymelinck]

I think the reasons in this post are most convoluted I have read so far why SPA should not be the default frontend architecture.

Real-time AI features like live translation, content generation, or computer vision processing suffer from network round-trip delays.

Which developer is thinking that it is a good idea to do those things in real time on a website?

AI applications frequently need to maintain state consistency across multiple AI services (embeddings, completions, fine-tuned models).

Are you suggesting each AI service should know the whole application state? Not all the components know the application state.

Client devices, particularly mobile phones and budget laptops, lack the computational power for real-time AI processing.

So you want to move the AI generation to the client devices?

You mention you used AI to help you write the post. But have you really understood what the content that was generated means?

I agree that SPA should not be the default frontend architecture, but there are real reasons why that is the case.

• When a site is mostly static content the best way to serve it is static.
• Why would you need state for the whole application, if only a few components on the pages are linked to each other

AI isn't going to kill SPA websites, smart developers are just going to apply it when it is needed. And that was already happening before the AI hype.

[Hank Chiu]

I suggest the hybrid approach.

When talking about architecture, there should be no defaults, you should consider the context (what's the users need, your goal, what kind of UX, etc) to develop flexibly from the very beginning. See my perspective in this article: Rethink non-SPA Web Development in 2025.

You still can develop in a way before AI-Era (SPA first). But I predict that when more AI-native applications come, that traditional approach may make you struggle in developing the product that matches users' expectations of AI experiences.

[david duymelinck]

SPA first
AI-native applications

What do those terms mean? I think you are putting those words together because it sounds great.

I read your other post and we have the same ideas.
The problem i have with this post is that the AI capabilities you mention are never going to happen on websites.
Take AI translation. People are never going to add all the languages to a website. Translations mean fonts, different reading directions, volume of the text. There are too many variables to just let an AI do the translation and that response can go on the website.

About the hybrid approach, why do you want to add AI processing to the rendering process? Static content is the fastest, and it doesn't care about content type, devices or network. So AI isn't on list either.

It looks like you want to use AI for parts where it shouldn't be a factor in the first place.

[Hank Chiu]

Never mind. Choose what you believe :)

[david duymelinck]

Can you explain why AI requirements are going to be a factor in the rendering?

There are media queries in CSS and the srcset attribute for images, but those are assumptions based on device specs.
For webworkers there is NetworkInformation, but that information is only estimated.
You can get the number of cores and the approximate RAM (in some browsers) from the browser request.
But all that is too little information to do an AI assessment.

They are going to provide information about the GPU, because most AI's use that to generate their answer. Or provide information about a dedicated AI chipset.

And then you could start to make an assumption about the AI capabilities of a device.
Also battery status is big one, you don't want to drain the battery of the device generating AI content.
That are big tasks to expose that information, so I don't see that happening soon.