I'm the developer of Tokenmaxxing, published by DijitalGözlük on the App Store as Usage for Claude Code & Codex. This is a founder's explanation of the product, with links to other tools you can evaluate for yourself. It is not an independent review or a performance benchmark.
A usage percentage answers one question. It doesn't necessarily tell you what to do next.
Having 30% left at the start of a reset window is different from having 30% left ten minutes before it ends. API spending introduces another question: how much did the work cost? And when you leave your Mac, a menu bar number stops being something you can glance at.
Those are the decisions I wanted Tokenmaxxing to help with: what is available, when it changes, and where I can see it while working across Apple devices.
The app captures in these banners use example accounts and values. They are not customer data. The devices and text are a presentation around the app captures.
Five other approaches worth looking at
These are five relevant alternatives, not a ranking by downloads, revenue or market share. The descriptions below come from their own documentation, checked on October 29, 2026. I have not benchmarked them against Tokenmaxxing.
CodexBar: a broad menu bar toolkit
Official project screenshot from its README. Source: https://github.com/steipete/CodexBar. Images remain the property of their respective owners.
CodexBar combines provider-specific usage meters and reset countdowns with API spending charts, local cost analysis, widgets and a bundled CLI. Its MIT-licensed source is public.
It is a serious option if you want broad provider coverage and a scriptable workflow. A menu bar, cost charts or widgets alone would not explain why I built another tracker; CodexBar already documents those capabilities.
My product direction puts more of the workflow into a shared Mac, iPhone and iPad application, with Motivation Mode and Away from Mac Reminder as explicit interactions. That is a design choice to evaluate, not proof that it is better for every developer.
Usage for Claude: a focused Apple-device experience
Official App Store promotional screenshot; any audience figures shown are the publisher’s own claims, not independently verified. Source: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/usage-for-claude/id6755173244. Images remain the property of their respective owners.
Usage for Claude documents session monitoring, charts, history, notifications, iCloud, widgets and Apple Watch support. Its App Store listing describes an app spanning Mac, iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch, with in-app purchases.
For someone primarily interested in Claude, that focus is useful. It also means I cannot honestly claim that bringing usage information to a phone is a new idea.
Tokenmaxxing's scope includes several coding agents and API-key providers. The difference I want readers to assess is whether that broader provider view and the particular reminder flow fit their work. Apple Watch is part of this competitor's documented offering; it is not a feature I am claiming for Tokenmaxxing.
Claude Tracker: detailed Mac account controls
Official project screenshot from its README; the pictured version may differ from the latest release. Source: https://github.com/hamed-elfayome/Claude-Usage-Tracker. Images remain the property of their respective owners.
Claude Tracker documents a native SwiftUI Mac app with account profiles, usage history, reset timers, notifications, API cost tracking, a terminal statusline and an optional notch HUD. Its current README also describes Codex profiles, despite the Claude-focused name. The project is MIT-licensed and documents local storage without cloud sync.
Its profile and desktop controls make it worth examining if the Mac is where you want to manage everything. Tokenmaxxing takes on the additional tradeoffs of private CloudKit records and a mobile receiving device. Local-only storage can be the preferred choice, depending on what you want to maintain and sync.
ccusage: start with the local logs
Official documentation screenshot, not a report from our own accounts. Source: ccusage documentation and original image in the project repository. Image belongs to its respective owner.
ccusage reads local coding-agent logs and produces token and estimated-cost reports. Its documentation covers Claude Code, Codex and other supported CLIs, including JSON output, cache accounting and an offline mode using cached pricing. It is MIT-licensed.
If your goal is to analyze local usage in a terminal or feed a report into a script, this is a good starting point.
Estimated token cost and a subscription's remaining allowance are different measures. I wanted a visual application that makes provider windows, reset timing and account context visible, while still showing API spending where supported. Neither view should be confused with an authoritative invoice or a guarantee that the next request will succeed.
AI Limitbar: keep the scope small
Capture of the publisher’s website and demo interface, not a hands-on capture of the installed app. Source: https://www.ai-limitbar.com/. Images remain the property of their respective owners.
AI Limitbar is a free Mac menu bar app for Claude Code and Codex usage windows and reset times. It documents a local-data approach: a Claude statusline helper writes a snapshot, and Codex readings come from session logs. The site explains that readings update with agent activity and become marked stale after 15 minutes.
That small scope is a strength for someone who wants a local readout rather than another account-connected application. Tokenmaxxing chooses a wider product scope, including mobile views and reminders. More screens and integrations also mean more connection, refresh and sync behavior to get right.
What I wanted to do differently
The differences below describe my product choices. They are not claims that no other app can implement them.
Put capacity next to the time it has left
A percentage without its reset window can be easy to misread. Is it the amount used, the amount remaining, or progress through a weekly allowance? The display needs to make that context clear.
In Tokenmaxxing, the provider detail puts the usage window and reset timing together, where the provider supplies that information. Motivation Mode adds a time-based interpretation of primary capacity. Its colors consider how usage compares with the time left in the reset window.
This is an opinionated choice. Someone may want a monitor that only warns when capacity is low. I also wanted an optional view that helps notice capacity approaching a reset without being used. That isn't an instruction to generate unnecessary work. It is information for deciding whether a useful task fits into the current window.
The history view adds another perspective: what happened across reset cycles the app actually observed? Used and unused capacity can tell a more useful story than a single current value.
That history has a boundary. Installing the app does not reconstruct every past session. Observed reset history starts with what the app can track going forward.
Example data. The countdown, capacity display and observed-cycle history answer different questions; the banner puts those app views side by side.
Keep the quick check in the Mac menu bar
The full application is useful for history, provider setup and detail. A quick check shouldn't require navigating there every time.
The Mac menu bar shows the providers you choose. That can be a coding-agent usage window or an API spending summary, depending on the connection. It also makes freshness visible. A value last updated several minutes ago should not look like a promise about what the provider will accept right now.
This is where the menu bar tools in the comparison are relevant. If a compact desktop readout is your entire requirement, start by evaluating those tools. Tokenmaxxing's menu bar is one part of a larger Mac, iPhone and iPad application.
Native app capture with example data. The menu is shown attached to the menu bar, rather than presented as an unrelated floating panel.
Continue the reminder after leaving the Mac
Away from Mac Reminder is about a different moment in the workflow. The Mac can notice an idle period, or a lock/screen-sleep event, and send a reminder event through private iCloud. An enabled receiving iPhone or iPad can then schedule a local notification.
Both ends matter: the Mac must have the feature enabled, and the receiving device needs its receiving preference and notification permission. Delivery also depends on iCloud and the operating system. It should not be described as an instant, guaranteed push channel.
The reminder doesn't transfer an agent's running task, execute a prompt, or remotely control the Mac. It reminds you that you can continue from a device where your chosen agent is available.
There is a deliberate limit on repetition. One away session should not turn into a stream of identical reminders. The implementation deduplicates received events and applies a sender cooldown.
This image is an illustrated flow, not a screenshot of an actual notification arriving. It requires iCloud and notification permissions.
Give important alerts a place to stay
A notification you miss while concentrating may as well not have appeared. On Mac, the optional persistent alert presentation keeps an important alert visible until you dismiss it.
Usage thresholds and API spending thresholds are different settings. A reset reminder answers when capacity changes. A spending alert answers whether a configured reference has been crossed. I wanted those distinctions to remain clear instead of treating every event as the same warning.
A spending alert is not a billing control. Tokenmaxxing does not enforce a provider's spending limit, stop an API request, or change the bill. Provider reporting can also arrive later than the underlying usage. The app is a monitor, and the interface should say so.
Actual Settings preview of the optional Mac alert presentation. This is a preview, not evidence of a live quota event.
The engineering choices behind those screens
Keeping these surfaces consistent is more work than drawing a gauge.
Provider data does not have a uniform shape. An agent allowance, a credit balance and a monthly API cost cannot safely be treated as interchangeable percentages. Tokenmaxxing groups connections into Coding Agents, AI Agents and API Keys, while keeping provider-specific context in their details.
The current maintained integrations include Claude Code, Codex, Base44, Lovable, Vercel v0, ChatGPT Work, Claude Cowork, OpenAI API and Anthropic API. Available detail depends on the provider and connection. Supporting a provider does not mean every provider exposes the same fields.
The app also has to distinguish stale information from a confirmed failure or a fresh result. A synced older record should not replace a newer verified reading simply because it arrived later. Otherwise the detail page, widget and menu bar can disagree about the same connection.
The storage boundaries matter too. Provider secrets belong in Apple Keychain. App records can sync through private CloudKit. Widgets and the menu bar consume redacted app-group projections rather than copies of provider credentials. These are specific storage choices, not a claim that the app makes no network requests or that every feature works offline.
There is a cost to the Apple-focused approach. Tokenmaxxing targets current Apple platforms; it isn't a Windows/Linux CLI replacement. A terminal report or an open-source desktop tool can be the better choice for a different workflow.
What is free, and what Pro changes
The free tier includes one active provider in each category and ads. Within that allowance, features such as the menu bar, widgets, alerts, history and Away from Mac Reminder remain available. Optional Pro removes the provider limits and ads.
Tokenmaxxing does not include a Claude, ChatGPT or other provider subscription. Provider accounts and API access are separate. Current localized Pro prices are shown in the App Store and purchase screen; I have not put a fixed worldwide price into this comparison.
What I would like feedback on
I want to know whether the extra context makes decisions easier. When you open a usage monitor, are you checking whether you can send the next prompt, deciding which agent to use, or looking for patterns across reset windows?
And if a menu bar number already solves your problem, what would make a phone view useful enough to open?
You can see the app and its screenshots at tokenmaxxingapp.com or find Usage for Claude Code & Codex on the App Store.
Disclosure: I build Tokenmaxxing. The five alternatives are linked to their own documentation. Their inclusion does not imply endorsement or that I have hands-on tested every version. Product information was checked on October 29, 2026.
Top comments (0)