When employees record work in one place, managers approve it somewhere else, and finance relies on disconnected spreadsheets, missing entries can delay invoicing and obscure project costs. The fix is a shared process that connects each record to the right project, task, person, and approval status.
Start by defining the information each record needs, then establish consistent entry, approval, and correction steps. Finally, verify that reports and exports give project and finance teams the data they need.
Define what each record must contain
Before configuring a tool, decide which fields support an actual planning, review, or financial decision. A typical time entry includes:
- Person and date
- Project and task or work category
- Hours and billable status
- A note, when context is needed
Expense records commonly need the date, category, amount, currency, project, description, and supporting receipt. Keep required fields to a practical minimum: unnecessary data entry adds friction and can lead to late or inaccurate submissions.
Make time entry fit the work
Different contributors may need different ways to record time. Consider a weekly timesheet, daily form, calendar or schedule view, and entry from the relevant project workspace. Whatever the interface, each method should write to a consistent underlying record.
A weekly view lets contributors check total hours, billable effort, and unsubmitted work before submitting. Comparing scheduled or assigned hours with actual time can also reveal differences that need review.
Keep draft and submitted records distinct
Unsubmitted entries should be straightforward to correct. After submission, make the status visible and restrict editing according to your organization’s control policy. If an approved entry needs changing, use a correction process that preserves the original decision and records the change.
Capture and group expenses
Record expenses close to the time they occur, while the receipt and project context are available. A centralized expense area can help with cross-project review; project-level entry can keep costs connected to the work that generated them.
Choose categories that support reporting without making entry cumbersome. Examples include travel, mileage, accommodation, equipment, subcontractor costs, and client-related purchases.
When related expenses need to be reviewed together, group them into a report—for example, by trip, billing period, project phase, or employee submission. This gives approvers context beyond an isolated line item and can make review easier to audit.
Document which expenses require approval. Some organizations review every expense; others set rules by project, category, or amount. Make the rules clear to employees, including what evidence they need to provide.
Assign approval and editing responsibilities
Submission, project review, and financial approval are separate responsibilities. A project lead might confirm that work was performed, while a finance or budget owner confirms whether a cost can be charged or invoiced.
- Let contributors create and edit their own unsubmitted entries.
- Limit approver access to the projects or teams they oversee.
- Do not allow users to approve their own submissions unless there is a justified exception.
- Protect approved records from casual editing.
- Give administrators the ability to configure project-, role-, and account-level rules.
Assign a primary approver and define what happens when that person is absent or a review is overdue. Automated reminders can prompt employees about missing submissions, notify approvers about pending work, and alert teams to rejected records. Reminders help most when owners, deadlines, and escalation rules are already established.
Prepare reports for project and finance decisions
Time and expense data is useful when it supports action. Project managers may need to see:
- Actual hours compared with assigned or estimated hours
- Billable and non-billable time by project or task
- Unsubmitted, rejected, and approved entries
- Expenses by project and category
- Costs concentrated in particular projects or work types
Finance teams may need approved records ready for invoicing or accounting review, expense reports awaiting approval, records changed after submission, period-based exports for reconciliation, and supporting notes or documents for audit purposes.
If financial processing happens in a separate system, exports can bridge the workflow. Define which system is the record of truth, and avoid maintaining competing versions of the same approved data.
Configure the surrounding project workflow
Time and expense records need a consistent project structure to be useful. Project templates, custom fields and statuses, configurable issue types, layouts, link types, and workflows can help teams represent work consistently and build reporting around it.
ONES.com is one example of a project and knowledge management platform with these project-configuration capabilities. Teams can evaluate it as part of the wider workflow, while separately confirming whether their chosen process meets requirements for time capture, expense processing, invoicing, and accounting integration. See the ONES.com platform and its case studies.
Implement and verify the process
- Map the current process. Record how employees submit time and expenses, who reviews them, and where approved data goes.
- Remove duplicate entry. Identify spreadsheets, email approvals, and manual status updates that can be replaced with a shared workflow.
- Standardize project structure. Agree on project, task, work-type, and expense-category conventions.
- Set permission boundaries. Match visibility and approval authority to project and financial responsibilities.
- Configure statuses. Distinguish draft, submitted, rejected, approved, exported, and corrected records where needed.
- Test reports before launch. Confirm that project managers and finance teams can obtain the information they need.
- Train for exceptions. Explain how to handle late, rejected, duplicate, or misassigned entries.
- Review and refine. Use rejection rates, late submissions, correction volume, and reporting gaps to identify where the process needs improvement.
During verification, check that entries appear under the correct project and category, approval status changes are visible, approved records are not casually editable, and period exports contain the information finance needs. If a correction is made, confirm that the prior approval history remains available.
Common failure modes
Recording hours without project context
Aggregated hours do not show which deliverable consumed effort or whether a project is at risk. Require enough context for planning and review without turning each entry into a lengthy report.
Allowing unrestricted edits after approval
Open editing can undermine billing, cost analysis, and audit trails. Route changes through a correction process that preserves the approval history.
Leaving approval ownership unclear
When several people can approve a record but no one owns the deadline, submissions can remain unreviewed. Assign a primary approver and define escalation rules for absences and overdue reviews.
Measuring submission volume instead of data quality
A high submission rate does not guarantee useful records. Check that entries are assigned to the right projects, classified consistently, and approved within the required period.
Keep the workflow useful and controlled
A dependable time and expense process combines simple entry with project context, clear permissions, accountable approvals, and reports that support delivery and financial work. Keep the required fields focused, preserve the history of approved records, and verify the full path from submission to reporting or export.
Top comments (0)