Within Order

Order is not random, nor is it arbitrary. Even what is considered random is based on order (formulas - stages - algorithms).

But without oversimplifying, let's delve deeper into this matter.

Does order occur because of repetition? What kind of repetition? Repetition that forms patterns. So how are patterns formed? Because of consistency. And how is consistency formed? Because there are limits that cannot be surpassed, then it returns to its original position.

If there is no consistency, the pattern will collapse, so there will be no pattern repetition, which means there will be no order.

So, randomness is not absolute but relative. This means it is not entirely random but relative as a characteristic of a state, which is a random pattern.

The order is the state, whereas the randomness is the diversity of an order.

If true randomness exists, then it must be ensured that the randomness is universal (comprehensive, complete) with no order at all.

1. If there is no order at all, it means there is no repetition, whereas what is random must repeat to appear random.

2. If there is no order at all, it means there are no patterns at all, whereas what is random must repeat so that we recognize the existence of a random pattern. If what is random has no pattern, it is unrecognizable, so why do we recognize the existence of randomness?

3. If there is no order at all, it means there is no consistency, whereas what is random must be consistently random, or there will be no randomness.

So it is clear here that what is random is not entirely random, which means it is not universal but relative, which means it is merely one pattern of diversity among other patterns, that is, a random pattern that is part of order itself.

That is why Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the facts of quantum physics show that the irregular movement of electrons does not mean complete randomness, but rather the non-random movement of electrons is still within the bounds of repetition in a consistent pattern that forms an electron cloud (like brush strokes that, although appearing irregular, still form a pattern within certain limits).

So do not philosophize in a way that makes it seem as if all meanings can be easily dismantled and reassembled without seeing the shape of their connections.

So? We accept randomness as randomness that is not entirely random. We accept consistent randomness. A random pattern. An order that appears to form diversity (randomness) that remains consistent.

THIS IS HOW TO PHILOSOPHIZE PROPERLY. THIS IS HOW TO BE CRITICAL OF CONTEXT & PERSPECTIVE, SO AS NOT TO TWIST AND OVERLAP MEANINGS.