DEV Community

Nibinorg
Nibinorg

Posted on

Cost Per Cut, Not Cost Per Disc: The Procurement Math Behind "Cheap"

AED 10 vs AED 20? That's not the real procurement question

"Why are you paying AED 20 when this one is AED 10?" is the most common - and most misleading - question in purchasing.

The unit price is a trap. The real question is: which disc gives the lowest reliable cost per actual cutting job?

The math (example)

  • AED 10 disc -> 20 cuts -> AED 0.50 per cut
  • AED 20 disc -> 60 cuts -> AED 0.33 per cut

The "expensive" disc is about 34% cheaper for the work it actually does - and more reliable on site.

Look beyond the unit price

Cost per cut is only the visible part. The cheap disc quietly costs you more in:

  • Cutting life (actual cuts)
  • Replacement frequency
  • Man-hours spent changing discs
  • Downtime
  • Material wastage
  • Safety risk when a worn disc is pushed too far
  • Consistent performance

The rule I buy by

After 17+ years in procurement and strategic sourcing across UAE/GCC construction and building materials, the principle never changed: procurement isn't buying the cheapest item - it's buying the lowest reliable cost for the actual work.

Same material. Different results. That's procurement.

- Nibin Varghese

Top comments (0)