Table of Contents
- What Developers Actually Need From Documentation
- How Project Managers Can Document Smarter
- Best Tools for Developer-Friendly Documentation
- Practical Tips for Developers to Improve Documentation
- Why Documentation Quality Directly Impacts Developer Productivity
- Action Plan: How to Fix Documentation in Your Team
Every developer has seen this scenario: you join a project, get access to the documentation, and within minutes you realize it doesn’t help you do your job.
It’s either outdated, bloated, or written in a way that makes sense to managers but not to builders. You close the doc, open Slack, and ask a teammate instead.
The irony? Project managers spend hours writing documents, but most of that work goes unread.
Why? Because most of the time, documentation isn’t written for developers. It’s written for reporting. And that’s the reason 90% of project documentation fails.
This blog explains why documentation goes wrong, what developers actually need, and how both developers and project managers can fix the disconnect.
The focus is simple: make documentation serve productivity, not bureaucracy.
Why Documentation Goes Wrong in Software Projects
One of the most common queries from developers is: “Why is project documentation so useless?” The answer lies in how it’s created. Most project managers don’t set out to make bad documentation, but four patterns keep repeating.
1. Documentation is written for stakeholders, not developers
- Project managers often aim their writing at executives, clients, or leadership.
- The tone becomes formal, the content focuses on reporting progress, and the details developers need like decisions, dependencies, or architecture, get buried or left out entirely.
2. Too much detail hides the essentials
Developers want context, not a novel. Long, dense reports make it hard to find critical information. When everything is documented, nothing stands out.
3. Documentation formats are static
Many teams still keep docs in PDFs, Word files, or PowerPoint slides. These formats don’t evolve with the project. By the time developers open them, they’re outdated.
4. Docs aren’t tied to workflows
- If documentation lives outside the tools where developers work like GitHub, Teamcamp, or project management systems, it gets forgotten.
- Developers aren’t going to dig through shared drives when they’re deep in code.
- The result: documentation feels disconnected, and developers don’t use it.
What Developers Actually Need From Documentation
To fix the problem, managers need to shift perspective. Developers don’t want polished reports—they want clarity and context. When asked “What does useful documentation look like?” developers consistently mention four things:
- Decision history: Why was this library chosen? Why did we avoid that database? This context prevents wasted debates later.
- Current state of the project: What’s done, what’s in progress, and what’s blocked.
- Dependencies and risks: What systems, APIs, or teams does this feature rely on?
- Actionable references: Links to issues, code, pull requests, or architecture diagrams.
If documentation answers these questions, it becomes a productivity booster instead of a bottleneck.
The 90% Mistake: Writing for the Wrong Reader
The biggest mistake project managers make is documenting for the wrong audience.
Executives want reports, but developers need working knowledge. When documentation focuses too heavily on reporting progress percentages completed, milestones achieved, budgets tracked. it loses value for the people actually building.
The signs are easy to spot:
- Long reports that don’t explain technical reasoning.
- Summaries that skip crucial details about trade-offs or risks.
- “Final documents” treated as deliverables instead of living records.
This approach guarantees documentation gets ignored. Developers stop trusting it, which leads to repeat questions, lost knowledge, and delays.
How Project Managers Can Document Smarter
If documentation is going to help rather than hinder, project managers need to shift to developer-first practices.
1. Write for the builder, not the boss
- Focus on the “why” behind decisions as much as the “what.”
- Use plain English with technical precision. Instead of writing “API optimization complete,” write “Reduced response time from 2s to 700ms using caching.”
- Eliminate unnecessary filler and keep docs relevant to people coding, testing, and shipping.
2. Keep it lightweight
Long reports discourage reading. Instead, keep documentation concise:
- One-page summaries for features or systems.
- Checklists and bullet points instead of paragraphs.
- Diagrams that show architecture and workflows at a glance.
3. Store documentation where developers already work
Docs shouldn’t live in email attachments. They should live in the same tools the team uses:
- GitHub or GitLab → Markdown files in repos.
- Teamcamp → Real-time notes, tasks, and discussions in one space.
- Jira / Linear → Decision logs and feature notes tied to tickets.
When documentation is part of the workflow, developers use it naturally.
4. Update continuously
The rule is simple: if the code changes, the docs should change too. Make documentation updates part of sprint planning, not an afterthought. Treat it like code—version-controlled, reviewed, and iterated.
Common Questions Developers Ask About Documentation
When developers discuss documentation online, the same questions surface again and again. Let’s answer them directly.
1. How much documentation is enough?
Enough to help a new developer join the project without asking ten questions. If a new hire can open the doc, understand the context, and start contributing, the documentation is the right size.
2. Should documentation be technical or simple?
Both. Use plain English to explain reasoning and workflows, but include technical references, code snippets, and architecture diagrams where needed. Think “clear writing with technical anchors.”
3. How often should documentation be updated?
At least once per sprint. Documentation should evolve alongside the codebase. A doc that hasn’t been updated in months is almost always misleading.
4. Where should documentation live?
In the same ecosystem where work happens. Version-controlled docs in Git, linked notes in Jira or Linear, or collaborative docs in a project management tool like Teamcamp are far more effective than isolated Word docs or shared drives.
Best Tools for Developer-Friendly Documentation
Many developers search for “best documentation tools for dev teams.” The right choice depends on your workflow.
- Markdown + Git → The simplest, most dev-friendly approach. Docs live in repos, versioned like code.
- Teamcamp → Combines project tracking and collaborative documentation, keeping everything in context with Project Wise.
- Notion → Flexible, fast to set up, good for internal knowledge sharing. Needs discipline to stay organized.
- Docusaurus → Great for teams that want docs to double as public developer portals.
The tool matters less than consistency. What matters most is that documentation is accessible, updated, and linked to daily work.
Store your every document at One place Project Wise with Teamcamp
Practical Tips for Developers to Improve Documentation
Documentation isn’t just the project manager’s job. Developers can improve it too. Here’s how:
- Add context in pull requests → Don’t just push code; explain why changes were made.
- Flag outdated docs → Outdated information causes confusion. If you see it, raise it.
- Push for decision logs → Encourage PMs to record the reasoning behind choices.
- Write small, focused notes → Instead of full reports, capture the essentials in short, digestible updates.
This shared responsibility reduces frustration and ensures documentation reflects reality.
Why Documentation Quality Directly Impacts Developer Productivity
Bad documentation costs more than just a few wasted minutes. It has real, measurable effects on productivity:
- Lost time: Developers chase information in chats or meetings that should have been documented.
- Duplicate work: Teams re-argue decisions or rebuild features because no one remembers the original reasoning.
- Onboarding delays: New developers struggle to get up to speed, slowing down delivery.
- Knowledge loss: When team members leave, undocumented reasoning disappears with them.
By contrast, good documentation:
- Reduces interruptions and back-and-forth questions.
- Speeds up onboarding, letting new hires contribute faster.
- Preserves knowledge across turnover.
- Keeps developers coding instead of chasing context.
For a team under deadlines, this difference is critical.
Action Plan: How to Fix Documentation in Your Team
If you’re a project manager:
- Write for developers first. Make sure every doc answers the “why” behind decisions.
- Keep it concise. Summaries, diagrams, and checklists work better than long reports.
- Tie docs to workflows. Store them in Git, Jira, or your project management tool.
- Update continuously. Make it part of sprint planning.
If you’re a developer:
- Contribute small notes. Add reasoning to PRs and tickets.
- Speak up when docs are outdated. Don’t let misinformation linger.
- Encourage decision logs. Push for recording context.
- Help shape culture. Treat documentation like code—iterative and collaborative.
Conclusion
Most project managers don’t realize how much their documentation impacts developers. Done wrong, it frustrates and slows down teams. Done right, it boosts productivity, reduces friction, and builds trust. Developers don’t want more documentation, they want better documentation.
If you’re a PM, ask yourself: Could a developer start work today by reading only your documentation?
If not, it’s time to rethink how you document your work.
FAQs
1. Why do most software project managers fail at documentation?
Because they write for reporting, not for usability. Developers need actionable clarity, not corporate jargon.
2. How can documentation boost developer productivity?
It reduces context-switching, prevents miscommunication, and speeds up onboarding.
3. What’s the best tool for project documentation?
Markdown + Git for dev-heavy teams, Notion/Confluence for cross-functional teams, or integrated tools like Teamcamp for task-linked docs.
4. Should developers contribute to project documentation?
Yes. Shared ownership ensures documentation stays accurate and relevant.
5. How often should project documentation be updated?
Every sprint or major release. Documentation should evolve with the project, not lag behind.
Top comments (0)