One of the most salient features of our Tech Hiring culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted.
One of the most salient features of our Tech Hiring culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted.
And while doing that you did a little a straw man fallacy
I know like everyone else that neither Java nor anything else is always secure.
I didn't even promote Java, I think each team should decide what makes sense for them.
That could be Rust, Go, Java, Kotlin, I don't have a clue because I don't know that team's context.
My point was that C and C++ are especially unsafe languages and that it's a real issue.
Before I answer can you describe me what kind of experience you have building large scale and secure C/C++ applications?
I never said I did. I never said C/C++ was secure. I only said Java isn’t secure.
And while doing that you did a little a straw man fallacy
I know like everyone else that neither Java nor anything else is always secure.
I didn't even promote Java, I think each team should decide what makes sense for them.
That could be Rust, Go, Java, Kotlin, I don't have a clue because I don't know that team's context.
My point was that C and C++ are especially unsafe languages and that it's a real issue.
But you offered Java as an alternative presumably because you’re alleging it’s a secure language. My link disproves that. That’s my only point.