I think the main issue of the community was that 1. This was not presented as a consultation (the 2.x API is going away in v.4), and 2. The way the negative reaction was handled (often condescending, and without addressing the issues which were brought up).
I think the main issue of the community was that 1. This was not presented as a consultation (the 2.x API is going away in v.4), and 2. The way the negative reaction was handled (often condescending, and without addressing the issues which were brought up).
A good explanation is here: old.reddit.com/r/vuejs/comments/c3...
A comment addressing this article very, is here: old.reddit.com/r/vuejs/comments/c3...
Lastly, the RFC was changed to add some clarifications about keeping the 2.x API in v.3 mid-discussion.