You don't have to have perfect knowledge to point out glaring mistakes. It's like seeing someone trying to nail something using a shoe instead of a hammer who says only someone who has been a master carpenter for 20 years is allowed to point out that a hammer is a better tool.
Hard work is a relative matter. For example, the fact that Docker uses the host kernel is in the documentation. It's better to provide the questions as-is and let people learn by doing the research (the questions themselves are good) rather than provide wrong/misleading answers.
Seems like you didn't read the part where I said you should correct respectfully
You're contradicting yourself saying "the questions themselves are good" when you literally called them "wrong", "bad interview question", "pointless".
If you feel a post is "wrong", "bad" or "pointless", there's nothing bad, its your view. But you should atleast correct respectfully if you're going to correct.
There's a difference between question and answer. One is pointless and another could be improved by asking it differently. Some of the answers are wrong, which is what I specifically said. The questions are ok as interview questions.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
You don't have to have perfect knowledge to point out glaring mistakes. It's like seeing someone trying to nail something using a shoe instead of a hammer who says only someone who has been a master carpenter for 20 years is allowed to point out that a hammer is a better tool.
Hard work is a relative matter. For example, the fact that Docker uses the host kernel is in the documentation. It's better to provide the questions as-is and let people learn by doing the research (the questions themselves are good) rather than provide wrong/misleading answers.
Seems like you didn't read the part where I said you should correct respectfully
You're contradicting yourself saying "the questions themselves are good" when you literally called them "wrong", "bad interview question", "pointless".
If you feel a post is "wrong", "bad" or "pointless", there's nothing bad, its your view. But you should atleast correct respectfully if you're going to correct.
There's a difference between question and answer. One is pointless and another could be improved by asking it differently. Some of the answers are wrong, which is what I specifically said. The questions are ok as interview questions.