In the first example, you don't need to use two generics to define readonly arrays.
You can simply use the built-in ReadonlyArray<number> generic
ReadonlyArray<number>
That's right! I just like the simplicity of only needing to memorize one keyword which then can be used with all types :)
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
In the first example, you don't need to use two generics to define readonly arrays.
You can simply use the built-in
ReadonlyArray<number>genericThat's right! I just like the simplicity of only needing to memorize one keyword which then can be used with all types :)