Failure one: nobody defined done
The most common dispute is not effort, it is definition. A milestone says character animation set and one side means twelve animations at production quality while the other means twelve blocked-out placeholders. Fix it by writing acceptance criteria per milestone before work starts. If you cannot describe what done looks like, the milestone is not ready to be quoted.
Failure two: the build cadence slipped
Projects rarely fail suddenly. They fail by a review being skipped, then another, and then a demo at month four that bears no resemblance to what anyone expected. A weekly testable build is the cheapest insurance in the industry. If a partner cannot produce one, that itself is information.
Failure three: QA was treated as a phase
Inconsistent QA is one of the two most cited complaints. It happens when testing is scheduled as a block at the end rather than run continuously. Bugs found in week two cost a fraction of bugs found in month five, because by then they are load-bearing. Ask how testing runs during production, not after it.
Failure four: timezone became an excuse
Distributed teams work fine when there is deliberate overlap and asynchronous discipline. They fail when a question costs 24 hours to answer, so people guess instead. Agree an overlap window and a response expectation in writing. The problem is never the timezone itself, it is that nobody agreed how to work across it.
Failure five: the contract left ownership vague
This one surfaces at the worst possible moment, at handover or when the relationship ends. If source code, assets and IP are not explicitly transferred to you in writing, assume they are not yours. Check licensing on third-party assets and on any AI-generated content too.
What good looks like
Acceptance criteria per milestone. A weekly build you can actually run. QA continuous rather than terminal. An agreed overlap window. Ownership in writing before anything starts. That is the whole list, and it is why we make all five standard rather than negotiable. See how to choose a studio.
Related: Outsourcing guide · Co-development and rescue · Choosing a studio · LiveOps outsourcing costs · In-house team vs outsourcing: the real numbers
Originally published on A Plus Games Studio, a game, AR and VR development studio in Sacramento, CA.
Top comments (0)