I don't think most JS developers that are reading this article don't know the concept of true pass by reference as it's used in other programming languages. That's why I think the wording I use is sufficient to get the point across that the reference is being copied instead of the object being copied, even though it is technically by value. Thanks for the suggestion!
I see you updated the wording, and yes, it's now much clearer. Awesome! Thanks!
We’re a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
We strive for transparency and don't collect excess data.