I agree, I don't really think anyone could truly be at 100% of any skill really. An approach I use is to break skill levels down into "great", "good", "fair", and "basic". This gives interviewers a rough insight and a platform from which they can ask questions to guage my knowledge. Having any skill at any percent completely ignores the dynamic flow of capabilities of the particular thing, be it a language or framework. But saying you're good or great at something implies a level of knowledge without insinuating that you know everything about it (which is virtually impossible unless you created that thing!)
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I agree, I don't really think anyone could truly be at 100% of any skill really. An approach I use is to break skill levels down into "great", "good", "fair", and "basic". This gives interviewers a rough insight and a platform from which they can ask questions to guage my knowledge. Having any skill at any percent completely ignores the dynamic flow of capabilities of the particular thing, be it a language or framework. But saying you're good or great at something implies a level of knowledge without insinuating that you know everything about it (which is virtually impossible unless you created that thing!)