Software businesses often fail gradually and then suddenly. Monthly recurring revenue may still be rising when the bank balance begins to fall, particularly if growth is being purchased through recruitment, paid acquisition and infrastructure commitments. A funding round that appeared likely can slip by several months, an enterprise customer can delay procurement, or churn can increase just as annual software contracts renew. By the time payroll becomes uncertain, many of the important decisions have already been postponed.
Runway is useful because it translates strategy into time, but a single headline figure can be misleading. Dividing cash by average monthly burn assumes costs and receipts will behave predictably. In reality, SaaS companies often face step changes: annual cloud commitments, tax payments, redundancy costs, chargebacks, professional fees and customer refunds. Founders need a cash forecast that recognises these events and distinguishes available cash from money that is restricted, disputed or required to fulfil existing obligations.
Establishing the real runway
The first task is to reconcile cash and liabilities. That means checking cleared balances, debt facilities and expected receipts against payroll, PAYE, VAT, hosting, rent, finance agreements and amounts owed to suppliers. It also means testing the timing of sales. A signed contract is not cash, and an invoice raised to an enterprise customer may remain unpaid for weeks beyond its stated terms. Forecasting should therefore include a realistic collection date and a downside case where material receipts are delayed.
Annual subscriptions require similar discipline. Upfront billing improves cash flow, but some of the money supports service that must be delivered over the remaining contract term. If the company spends those receipts on rapid expansion, it may be unable to maintain the platform or support customers later. Deferred revenue is an accounting concept, but it also points to a commercial obligation that matters when assessing whether the business can continue.
Founders should then separate core operating costs from expenditure that assumes continued growth. Cloud usage, security, customer support and essential engineering may be required to keep the service functioning. Other expenditure, including speculative recruitment, experimental products and poorly measured acquisition channels, may be reduced without immediately damaging the installed customer base. The purpose is not indiscriminate cost cutting. It is to understand which costs preserve value and which consume runway without a sufficiently clear return.
Infrastructure commitments deserve specific attention because they may not fall as quickly as headcount or advertising. Reserved instances, minimum-spend agreements, data providers and software licences can create liabilities beyond the apparent shut-down date. The company should review termination rights, notice periods and personal guarantees before assuming a contract can simply be cancelled. The same applies to office leases and equipment finance.
Managing stakeholders before the crisis point
Once the cash position is clear, founders need a credible plan for investors and lenders. A request for further funding should explain the amount required, the milestones it is intended to reach and the consequences if the funding is not secured. Optimistic pipeline figures are unlikely to compensate for unexplained variances in prior forecasts. Investors will usually want to see that management understands churn, gross margin, customer acquisition cost, retention and the cash impact of growth.
Employees also need careful management. Founders may hope to protect morale by withholding concerns, but commitments about future employment or pay should not be made without a reasonable basis. If redundancies are contemplated, employment law, consultation obligations and the cash cost of the process require professional advice. Delaying decisions until wages cannot be paid is likely to reduce the options available and can create additional claims against the company.
Customers and suppliers should not be treated as a single group. Some suppliers may agree revised terms where they understand the plan and see a realistic route to payment. Critical providers may instead reduce credit or suspend service, so dependencies must be identified before negotiations begin. Customers may be willing to renew early or expand a contract, but incentives should not create uneconomic obligations or require the company to accept advance money for services it is unlikely to deliver.
Board governance becomes increasingly important as runway shortens. Decisions should be supported by current financial information, and minutes should record the assumptions considered. Founders who are also directors must remember that their legal role is distinct from their position as shareholders. When insolvency is probable, the interests of creditors become central, even where investors are encouraging the company to pursue a high-risk strategy in the hope of preserving equity value.
When restructuring or insolvency must be considered
A company may be insolvent if it cannot pay debts as they fall due or if its liabilities exceed its assets. For a SaaS company, the balance-sheet assessment may be complicated by intellectual property and internally developed software whose realisable value is uncertain. A valuation prepared for fundraising is not necessarily the amount that could be achieved in a distressed sale. Directors should avoid relying on an aspirational enterprise value to dismiss immediate cash-flow problems.
There may still be opportunities to preserve the product or business. Informal restructuring can involve revised creditor terms, new capital, asset sales or a reduction in operating scope. A company voluntary arrangement can, in appropriate cases, create a binding compromise with creditors, whilst administration may be used where one of its statutory objectives can be achieved. These are formal processes with consequences and costs, and their suitability depends on the company’s detailed position.
If the business cannot be rescued, a creditors’ voluntary liquidation may provide an orderly process for closing the company and realising its assets. Source code, domains, contracts and customer relationships may have value, but ownership, licences, data protection and transfer restrictions all need examination. A liquidator will also investigate the company’s affairs and directors’ conduct, including the decisions taken as insolvency approached.
Founders should be cautious about transferring assets, repaying connected parties or starting a new company using the old business’s property without proper advice and valuation. Transactions at an undervalue, preferences and restrictions concerning the reuse of a liquidated company’s name can all become relevant. Personal guarantees and director loan accounts may also affect founders personally, although the outcome depends on the documents and circumstances.
The point of taking advice before the cash is gone is not that one procedure will automatically rescue the startup. It is that choices narrow as liquidity disappears. Reliable information may allow the board to secure funding, reduce losses, preserve a viable service or prepare an orderly closure. In some circumstances, company administration may provide a formal route through which a rescue, restructuring or sale can be pursued, but its suitability depends on the startup’s current figures, contracts and creditor position.
Top comments (0)