Here is one article I am going to pick on for a minute; not because there is anything specifically wrong with it... or that it was unhelpful (Clearly based on the comments it was...) but I only saw it because it was pushed via email digest. It was well written and clearly there was some good discussion on it.
We have TONS of "intro to git" articles. Do we need more? The title is disingenuous. You aren't mastering git in 7 minutes. Git is complex and has a LOT of features. Nobody is mastering that in a few days even.
Is this something that should be pushed out via the digest emails?
I think this brings up the need (discussed elsewhere here) for finding a way to group content by "experience level" or "interest" or something.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
For instance: dev.to/valeriavg/master-git-in-7-m...
Here is one article I am going to pick on for a minute; not because there is anything specifically wrong with it... or that it was unhelpful (Clearly based on the comments it was...) but I only saw it because it was pushed via email digest. It was well written and clearly there was some good discussion on it.
We have TONS of "intro to git" articles. Do we need more? The title is disingenuous. You aren't mastering git in 7 minutes. Git is complex and has a LOT of features. Nobody is mastering that in a few days even.
Is this something that should be pushed out via the digest emails?
I think this brings up the need (discussed elsewhere here) for finding a way to group content by "experience level" or "interest" or something.