Nice detailed analysis šš» However, since doing research on micro frontends before myself, I have one question:
How did you ensure to achieve a heterogenous sample so that the sample also includes people that have never heard of micro Frontends or are not interested in? I imagine that mostly people that have some kind of relation to micro frontends answer such a study, so Iām not sure whether such a study can capture the whole picture.
Keep up the good work. Stuff like this brings the field of microfrontends forward šš»
Great question. As remarked this study is certainly biased as I was the primary person to not only write the questions, but also to promote it. Thus a larger fraction will have heard about microfrontends beforehand.
Note, however, that the study was not about the adoption in general, rather how they are being used from a technical perspective. Thus having more qualified participants was certainly fine.
For next year my goal would be to find 5-10 interested peers to create a much larger, more detailed, and less biased study.
Any help would be appreciated!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Nice detailed analysis šš» However, since doing research on micro frontends before myself, I have one question:
How did you ensure to achieve a heterogenous sample so that the sample also includes people that have never heard of micro Frontends or are not interested in? I imagine that mostly people that have some kind of relation to micro frontends answer such a study, so Iām not sure whether such a study can capture the whole picture.
Keep up the good work. Stuff like this brings the field of microfrontends forward šš»
Great question. As remarked this study is certainly biased as I was the primary person to not only write the questions, but also to promote it. Thus a larger fraction will have heard about microfrontends beforehand.
Note, however, that the study was not about the adoption in general, rather how they are being used from a technical perspective. Thus having more qualified participants was certainly fine.
For next year my goal would be to find 5-10 interested peers to create a much larger, more detailed, and less biased study.
Any help would be appreciated!