DEV Community

Cover image for Here is why you should not be too quick at judging people by their GitHub activity stats

Here is why you should not be too quick at judging people by their GitHub activity stats

Bobby Iliev on January 25, 2021

Introduction I am a supporter of the opensource movement and I truly admire people like Eddie Jaoude, Matt Cowley and all other open-sou...
Collapse
 
miguelmj profile image
MiguelMJ

This is very interesting 🤔
In my opinion, the activity graph is only a indicator of the interest of a person in GitHub, not about the quality of his/her contributions. When I want to see if someone makes interesting contributions I usually navigate through the repos. I think that's what a recruiter would do too.
However, this is a fantastic demonstration!

Collapse
 
rileytomasek profile image
Riley Tomasek • Edited

A good recruiter would, but there are many recruiters who have only a super basic understanding of GitHub, or how software in general works.

The repos that you have pinned are probably the most important part of your profile from a hiring perspective.

Collapse
 
miguelmj profile image
MiguelMJ

That makes sense, I hadn't thought of it!

Collapse
 
bobbyiliev profile image
Bobby Iliev

Very good point!

Collapse
 
bobbyiliev profile image
Bobby Iliev

Thank you 🙏
Absolutely! This should be the way to go and I hope that more and more people are actually doing it. Though it could be tricky as your contributions could be private and still show in your activity graph.

Collapse
 
eltaiguer profile image
Jose Gazzano

And also it doesn't really tell you much, I've been working as a part-time developer between 2012-2016 and full time since then, if you check my graph you would see a rather sparse graph.

Does that mean I'm not coding enough? Or that I just do fewer commits for each feature?

One developer that has tons of small commits on a PR against one that squashes them, how would they match against?

Collapse
 
jimmont profile image
Jim Montgomery

The Dev.to article immediately following this in the posts list is "How to get 600+ Github stars in 2 days" dev.to/revolist/hot-to-get-400-git...

Collapse
 
bobbyiliev profile image
Bobby Iliev

That's interesting, I think it's because the two articles were posted on the same date and they have git in the title + github tag.

Collapse
 
jimmont profile image
Jim Montgomery • Edited

I found it hilariously funny that one article's premise is broadly be thoughtful and well considered while the other is more in the other direction of generate lots of attention. Through my career I tend to hate being the center of attention so under play my position, which doesn't work well in this industry, the past decade-ish. Sort of funny to see the various dynamics in this area of work.

Collapse
 
igordsm profile image
Igor Montagner

Why would you judge someone from their Github activity stats? I mean, people seriously do that?

Collapse
 
bobbyiliev profile image
Bobby Iliev

Mainly recruiters, and as @rileytomasek mentioned in the comments, a good recruiter would not do that, but there are many recruiters who have only a super basic understanding of GitHub, or how software in general works.

Collapse
 
anubhavitis profile image
Anubhav Singhal

This is incredible!
I didn't know it was possible!

Collapse
 
bobbyiliev profile image
Bobby Iliev

Yes, it is crazy what a simple Bash script could do 🙌

Collapse
 
alexgeorgiev17 profile image
Alex Georgiev

Wow, that's super crazy. I agree with you that people should take their time when looking at someone's github account and their contributions graph.

Cheers

Collapse
 
bobbyiliev profile image
Bobby Iliev

Yes, I absolutely agree. It is not fair on the hard-working maintainers and other people who actually do meaningful contributions.

Collapse
 
emperoryp7 profile image
Yash Pandey (YP) • Edited

That's cheating!! Cries in corner. 😢
It was fun to make it all green by contributing to open source and making many commits for our projects.