// , “It is not so important to be serious as it is to be serious about the important things. The monkey wears an expression of seriousness... but the monkey is serious because he itches."(No/No)
The first 3 sentences of the first study you linked, at least the summary, are as follows:
Racism, sexism, and ageism persist in modern day organizations and may translate into workplace discrimi-
nation, which can undermine organizational effectiveness. We provide the first meta-analysis comparing the relationships between these three types of prejudice (racism, sexism, and ageism) and three types of work-
place discrimination (selection, performance evaluation, and opposition to diversity-supportive policies). Across outcomes, racism was associated with workplace discrimination, whereas sexism was not.
I also looked briefly into number 12, as I know several women working in STEM fields.
"Men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced), with the exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference." pnas.org/content/early/2015/04/08/...
Number 12 was a real surprise for me. Their methodology looks sound enough, and despite the slim N they raised a point that seems worth further investigation at least.
The study's report ends with a happy little note of optimism:
These results suggest it is a propitious time for women launching careers in academic science. Messages to the contrary may discourage women from applying for STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) tenure-track assistant professorships.
Anyway, it looks like you put a lot of effort into that list, and it seems unfortunate to me that it's been marked as low quality.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I can't ignore your Twitter account as many of the articles and studies come from your Twitter.
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14R...
WIP. This is as far as I got over my lunch. I'll comment when my responses are complete and I've added my own data.
The first 3 sentences of the first study you linked, at least the summary, are as follows:
I also looked briefly into number 12, as I know several women working in STEM fields.
Number 12 was a real surprise for me. Their methodology looks sound enough, and despite the slim N they raised a point that seems worth further investigation at least.
The study's report ends with a happy little note of optimism:
Anyway, it looks like you put a lot of effort into that list, and it seems unfortunate to me that it's been marked as low quality.