Smiling person, father of two, Husband, Senior Developer/Architect (in that exact order, it's important)
Experience in development since 2004
Linux user and advocate since 2001
Full-stack developer. I've worked on all code layers - from ideation and design to development, deployment, automation, & maintenance. I enjoy learning and I'm constantly striving to improve my craft!
That’s good to know. I read somewhere that NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) speculates that RSA 2048 will be safe to use until 2030 (maybe +10 years for RSA 4096). By that time, we’ll probably see more ECDSA adoption. But yes using ECDSA today is future-proofing your systems security.
Smiling person, father of two, Husband, Senior Developer/Architect (in that exact order, it's important)
Experience in development since 2004
Linux user and advocate since 2001
Full-stack developer. I've worked on all code layers - from ideation and design to development, deployment, automation, & maintenance. I enjoy learning and I'm constantly striving to improve my craft!
Ok, I'm using ED25519 for more than a year now, but it's not widely adopted.
That’s good to know. I read somewhere that NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) speculates that RSA 2048 will be safe to use until 2030 (maybe +10 years for RSA 4096). By that time, we’ll probably see more ECDSA adoption. But yes using ECDSA today is future-proofing your systems security.
ED25519 is not exactly EDDSA, but I agree with you.
Oh my bad. I was thinking that ED25519 was a type of ECDSA instead of ECC. 😅