A yes-or-no tarot experience looks simple, but the product boundary matters. The answer should remain structured and deterministic while any AI layer explains the result without changing it.
The core model
Use a small, explicit answer set: yes, no, maybe, and not yet. Store that result with the card data. The AI receives the fixed answer as context and may add reflective guidance, but it cannot override the answer.
This separation makes the experience easier to test and more honest for users. It also keeps failure modes clear: if the explanation service is unavailable, the structured result still works.
A practical reflection loop
- Ask a question about a choice the reader can influence.
- Draw one card for speed or three unique cards for context.
- Show the fixed answer first.
- Invite the reader to name one fact, one uncertainty, and one next step.
A working example is the free Yes or No Tarot reading. It supports one-card and three-card modes while keeping the answer boundary explicit.
Tarot should be framed as educational self-reflection. It should not claim guaranteed prediction or replace professional advice.
Top comments (0)