DEV Community

chovy
chovy

Posted on Originally published at dev.profullstack.com

Why we still reach for Jobs and Musk

Why we still reach for Jobs and Musk

My chief strategist told me today that I am a Steve Wozniak without a Steve Jobs.

Nobody has to explain that sentence. That is the part worth noticing. Two names, no setup, and it lands: builds the thing, cannot sell the thing. The personas have outlived every argument about the actual men. They are units of measurement now, and we reach for them because there is still nothing better to reach for.

I took it as a compliment. I also think the persona I am copying is the other one.

Not Jobs. Musk, and specifically the least glamorous part of Musk, which is that every company he owns is a customer of every other company he owns. SpaceX launches Starlink satellites and Starlink pays SpaceX to do it. The Tesla vision stack is what Optimus runs on. None of that is a partnership announcement. Those are invoices. Money actually moves.

That is the part I have been copying, out of a garage, at a scale that would fit in one of his line items.

Profullstack is 47 products. CoinPay settles the crawler paywall. x402-gateway is the paywall, ported to seven languages now, and it runs on every site in the fleet, so a bot that wants our data pays through a processor we own. CrawlProof sells ads on the same pages the bot was trying to eat, and it opens the campaign by itself about 38 seconds after anything publishes. myna does the publishing. nichedb sells the datasets. The partners package is how somebody else's dataset gets onto the shelf.

Pull any one of those out and the rest keep working, just worse. That is the whole test. A rising tide is not a slide in a deck. It is whether the other boats notice when one sinks.

This scales down a lot further than founders, and I think that is the actual reason the personas keep getting reached for.

A developer used to get paid for one component of one product. That was always the most arbitrageable position in the building and it is the first one the machines got cheap at. What holds value is owning a connected surface of work where each piece lowers the cost of the next. The CLI feeds the library, the library feeds the post, the post feeds the reputation, the reputation feeds the contract. Same flywheel, one person wide.

The catch is that nobody can wire it for you. Integration is the one job that requires being the subject matter expert across the whole surface, because the connections only exist to someone who can see both ends. You can hire a specialist for any single box. You cannot hire one for the space between them.

Developers hit this first. Every knowledge worker is next.

Here is where Joe is right about me, though.

Woz built a machine better than it needed to be and would not have sold a single unit alone. And Musk's real edge was never the integration. It is that he can raise money and belief years ahead of revenue, and the integration is what he does with the money after it arrives. Running the flywheel without the fundraising is copying the visible half. I know that. I am doing it anyway, on five boxes and a monthly spend cap I burn through in about a week.

I want the second trillionaire to come out of a bad garage in Silicon Valley. I would rather it not be another one who got there by being expensive to everyone underneath him.

So, the first consultant we are hiring.

Profullstack is looking for a homeless usability tester.

Not charity, and not a story for this blog. Someone living outside is an extreme user in the sense the accessibility research means it. Cracked screen. Nine percent battery. Public wifi that drops mid-request. No fixed address to receive a verification code. A library terminal with a 40 minute session cap. Zero patience for a six step onboarding flow. Every one of those is a real constraint our software fails on right now, and not one person on the payroll will ever hit them.

If your signup survives someone charging their phone at a McDonald's outlet, your signup works.

The terms are the actual idea. Paid at a real rate. Weekly or daily, not net 30, because net 30 is a payment term written by people with a buffer. No address requirement. We supply the device. And the person is a consultant with a name and an invoice, not content.

Wozniak gave computers away to schools. That is the persona too. It just never made it into the shorthand.

How this was written: drafted with an AI assistant from my own notes, then edited by me.

Top comments (0)